Connecticut House Bill HB05437

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/12
• Refer: 3/6/12
• Report Pass: 3/23/12
• Refer: 3/30/12
• Report Pass: 4/5/12
• Engrossed: 4/11/12
• Report Pass: 4/13/12
• Chaptered: 5/29/12
• Enrolled: 5/31/12
• Passed: 6/15/12

Caption

An Act Concerning The Definitions Of Mental Retardation And Intellectual Disability.

Impact

The enactment of this bill would have a significant impact on state laws by updating definitions in numerous statutes related to disability services and support. Various sections of the state law will now refer to 'intellectual disability' rather than 'mental retardation', which could enhance the dignity and respect afforded to individuals with such diagnoses. Additionally, the new definitions aim to reflect the realities of modern assessments and individual needs, ensuring that services are better tailored to those affected.

Summary

House Bill 5437, titled 'An Act Concerning The Definitions Of Mental Retardation And Intellectual Disability', seeks to revise the terminology and definitions associated with mental retardation, substituting it with intellectual disability in various state statutes. The bill redefines the criteria for what constitutes intellectual disability, emphasizing significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior that originate during the developmental period. This change aligns with contemporary understanding and language used in the field of intellectual disabilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 5437 appears to be generally positive, with support from various advocacy groups and professionals in the field of mental health and disabilities. The bill is viewed as a necessary step towards eliminating outdated terminology that carries stigma. However, there may still be concerns among some stakeholders about the practical implications of changing definitions on funding and service delivery for individuals with disabilities.

Contention

While there is broad support for the intention behind HB 5437, some contention may arise regarding the implementation of the new definitions across existing programs and services. Questions have been raised about how effectively state agencies can transition to the updated language and ensure that all relevant statutes are aligned. As service providers adapt to these changes, there may be discussions on the adequacy of training and resources required to support the new definitions in practical settings.