Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05450

Introduced
3/7/12  
Refer
3/7/12  
Report Pass
3/22/12  
Report Pass
3/22/12  
Refer
4/2/12  
Refer
4/2/12  
Report Pass
4/10/12  
Report Pass
4/10/12  
Refer
4/19/12  
Refer
4/19/12  
Report Pass
4/23/12  
Refer
4/30/12  
Report Pass
5/1/12  

Caption

An Act Establishing A Basic Health Program.

Impact

The bill's implementation is expected to significantly affect state health laws by integrating the Basic Health Program into existing safety nets such as the HUSKY Plan. This integration is intended to streamline access to healthcare services, particularly for those who previously fell through the gaps created by existing programs. Additionally, the legislation calls for an examination of the reimbursement rates for providers in a move to ensure that individuals receiving benefits through this program do not face higher costs and that healthcare providers are incentivized to participate in the network, thereby enhancing service delivery.

Summary

House Bill 05450 establishes a Basic Health Program to provide health insurance coverage for individuals under the age of sixty-five who have incomes not exceeding two hundred percent of the federal poverty level and are ineligible for traditional medical assistance under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. Set to be implemented by January 1, 2014, this program aims to enhance healthcare accessibility for low-income residents while ensuring that benefits remain consistent with standards defined under the Affordable Care Act. The bill envisions a system that will enable applicants from qualifying brackets to receive comprehensive medical benefits without facing steep costs, thus striving to improve overall public health within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 05450 is largely supportive among proponents who see it as a crucial step toward bridging healthcare coverage gaps for low-income individuals. Advocates argue that establishing a Basic Health Program aligns with contemporary healthcare reforms aimed at inclusivity and affordability. However, there are also emerging concerns regarding the potential implications for state budgets, especially in relation to funding and sustainability given the restrictions imposed on income levels. Critics are cautious about the long-term fiscal impact of expanding coverage under the program and the burden it may place on state resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention stem from the balancing act between expanding coverage and managing state finances. Opponents of the bill raise concerns that extending health benefits to a larger population may inadvertently lead to a strain on state funds, especially if federal support does not meet projected needs. Questions also arise around the efficiency and effectiveness of integrating the new Basic Health Program with existing services, which some stakeholders believe could lead to bureaucratic complications. The proposal to streamline governance through a committee overseeing provider reimbursements has also sparked discussions about the adequacy of oversight and stakeholder representation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CO HB1191

Elections to Fill County Commissioner Vacancies

CA AB1591

Insurance Commissioner: legislative reporting.

CA AB2142

Insurance: home protection companies.

CO HB1319

County Commissioner Vacancies

CA SB269

Credit unions.

NJ A829

Expands number of disorders included in newborn screening program.

OK SB1240

Insurance; updating to statutory requirement; updating statutory reference; conforming language. Effective date.

NJ A1862

Establishes pilot program to allow certain counties and municipalities to use single firm for design and inspection services on certain transportation projects.