Connecticut House Bill HB05467

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/8/12
• Refer: 3/8/12
• Report Pass: 3/27/12
• Refer: 4/5/12
• Report Pass: 4/12/12
• Refer: 4/19/12
• Report Pass: 4/23/12
• Refer: 4/26/12
• Report Pass: 4/30/12
• Refer: 5/1/12
• Report Pass: 5/3/12
• Engrossed: 5/4/12
• Report Pass: 5/5/12
• Chaptered: 5/29/12
• Enrolled: 5/31/12
• Passed: 6/15/12

Caption

An Act Creating A Workforce To Make Improvements Around Connecticut's Public Airports.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would modify existing laws pertaining to the preservation and improvement of Connecticut's public airports. The provisions outlined in the bill aim to prevent the closure or sale of vital infrastructure, ensuring that airports can continue to function as centers of transportation and economic activity. Furthermore, it introduces a requirement for project contracts to reserve at least 30% for veterans, thereby supporting the reintegration of service members into the workforce and promoting their vocational skills in relevant areas such as weatherization and insulation.

Summary

House Bill 5467, titled 'An Act Creating A Workforce To Make Improvements Around Connecticut's Public Airports,' seeks to enhance the quality and sustainability of Connecticut's public airports through various initiatives. The bill proposes measures that allow the state to have the right of first refusal to purchase airports under threat of sale or closure. It further stipulates that the Department of Transportation may acquire development rights for these airports while ensuring they remain public. Additionally, the legislation sets forth a framework for state funding, covering up to 90% of capital improvement costs, aiming to ensure that public airports can continue to operate effectively and serve the community's needs.

Sentiment

The reaction to HB 5467 has been generally positive, especially from veterans' groups and stakeholders involved with airport operations. Supporters view this bill as a necessary step towards safeguarding vital community assets while simultaneously providing employment opportunities for veterans. However, there may be some concerns regarding the funding approach and whether the proposed allocations are sufficient to meet the anticipated needs of the capital improvements detailed in the bill.

Contention

One point of contention surrounding HB 5467 may arise from the specifics of how the funding and project allocations are determined. Critics and budgetary analysts may challenge the feasibility of the state's contribution to capital improvements, questioning whether the remaining balance will adequately incentivize private partners. Additionally, the allocation of contracts to veterans also prompts discussions about ensuring fair competitive practices while balancing the priority for these projects.