Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00159

Introduced
2/17/12  
Refer
2/17/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Report Pass
3/20/12  
Refer
3/27/12  
Refer
3/27/12  
Report Pass
4/3/12  
Report Pass
4/3/12  
Engrossed
4/25/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning A Study Of The Elimination Of The Provision That Permits Foreclosure By A Holder Of A Note Who Does Not Have Legal Title To The Mortgaged Premises.

Impact

The bill, if enacted, has the potential to significantly impact state laws governing foreclosure and property rights. By addressing the circumstances under which foreclosure can occur, it seeks to enhance the security of property ownership for consumers while possibly affecting lenders' ability to execute foreclosures. The Banking Commissioner is expected to report findings by January 1, 2013, which may lead to recommendations for changes in existing foreclosure regulations, reflecting the needs of the banking sector as well as consumer protection advocates.

Summary

SB00159 is an act that mandates the Department of Banking to conduct a study regarding the provision that allows foreclosure by a holder of a mortgage note who does not possess the legal title to the mortgaged property. This legislation underscores significant concern regarding property rights and the legal mechanisms of foreclosure. It aims to evaluate whether the existing provisions should be reformed to protect consumers and ensure that only individuals or entities with legal ownership can initiate a foreclosure process.

Sentiment

The legislation appears to evoke a mixed sentiment among stakeholders. Proponents, particularly consumer rights advocates, view the study as a necessary step towards safeguarding homeowners from potential abuses in the foreclosure process. Conversely, some banking institutions and lenders may express concerns over the implications of such a change on their operations and the overall housing market, arguing that reforming foreclosure provisions could hinder necessary financial processes.

Contention

Notable contention exists surrounding whether the current regulatory framework adequately balances the rights of property owners against the interests of financial institutions. This discussion encapsulates broader themes of legal ownership and consumer protection within the realm of real estate. The outcome of the study, as mandated by this bill, could lead to significant changes in the statutory context of foreclosures in the state, stimulating further debate about property rights and banking practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.