Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00310

Introduced
2/29/12  
Refer
2/29/12  
Report Pass
3/26/12  
Report Pass
3/26/12  
Refer
4/9/12  
Refer
4/9/12  
Report Pass
4/16/12  
Report Pass
4/16/12  
Refer
4/24/12  
Refer
4/24/12  
Report Pass
4/26/12  
Report Pass
4/26/12  
Report Pass
4/27/12  
Report Pass
4/27/12  
Engrossed
5/2/12  
Engrossed
5/2/12  
Report Pass
5/4/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Removal Of Individuals From The State Child Abuse And Neglect Registry.

Impact

The bill modifies existing policies related to how child abuse findings are recorded and processed within the state. It emphasizes the importance of confidentiality in maintaining the child abuse registry while also ensuring that individuals have a fair chance to contest findings against them. The introduction of a structured appeal process aims to make the system more transparent and effective, potentially reducing the stigma attached to individuals who have been rehabilitated but remain on the registry.

Summary

SB00310 aims to improve the process by which individuals can appeal their inclusion on the state child abuse and neglect registry. The bill establishes a clearer procedure for individuals found responsible for abuse or neglect to remove their names from the registry after a specified period. By allowing individuals to apply for the removal of their names after five years, provided good cause is shown, the bill promotes rehabilitation and recognizes the potential for individuals to change positively over time.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment toward SB00310 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for individuals seeking rehabilitation and second chances. Supporters argue that the bill reflects a compassionate understanding of human growth and the complexities surrounding past mistakes, particularly regarding child welfare. Critics may point out concerns about the rigorousness of due process and the potential for false negatives in determining an individual’s suitability for removal from the registry.

Contention

During discussions surrounding SB00310, points of contention focused on the balance between public safety and individual rights. Some legislators emphasized the need for a cautious approach to ensure that any individual who poses an ongoing risk is not removed from the registry without adequate scrutiny. Others highlighted the importance of not unfairly punishing individuals indefinitely for past mistakes, advocating for a more rehabilitative and restorative approach to child welfare.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05062

An Act Concerning The Removal Of Individuals From The State Child Abuse And Neglect Registry.

CT HB05516

An Act Concerning The Removal Of Individuals From The State Child Abuse And Neglect Registry.

NJ A5135

Establishes central registry for, and provides for informational outreach to, senior citizens living in New Jersey.

TX HB3711

Relating to including medically fragile individuals in the Texas Division of Emergency Management's emergency assistance registry for wellness checks during certain emergencies.

CT HB07001

An Act Concerning The Notification Of Certain Employers Of The Placement Of An Employee On The Child Abuse Or Neglect Registry.

CT SB00911

An Act Concerning Homemaker Services And Homemaker-companion Agencies.

CT HB05294

An Act Concerning A Registry Of Persons Convicted Of Financial Crimes Against Elderly Persons.

CT SB00266

An Act Concerning A Registry Of Persons Convicted Of Financial Crimes Against Elderly Persons.