Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00392

Introduced
3/8/12  
Introduced
3/8/12  
Refer
3/8/12  
Refer
3/8/12  
Report Pass
3/22/12  
Report Pass
3/22/12  
Refer
4/4/12  
Refer
4/4/12  
Report Pass
4/11/12  
Report Pass
4/11/12  
Refer
4/17/12  

Caption

An Act Concerning Pharmacy Reimbursement.

Impact

If enacted, SB00392 will affect how pharmacies receive payments for prescription medications provided to recipients of Medicaid, thereby impacting pharmacy operations, financial sustainability, and potentially patient access to medications. This move aims to create a more uniform reimbursement structure, which could simplify the billing process for pharmacies while adhering to federal standards. It may also affect the pricing of drugs for patients who rely on these state-administered programs.

Summary

SB00392, titled 'An Act Concerning Pharmacy Reimbursement', proposes changes to the reimbursement process for legend drugs under medical assistance programs in Connecticut. Specifically, it sets forth conditions under which pharmacies will be reimbursed, aiming to align state reimbursement rates with federal guidelines. The bill stipulates a reimbursement based on either the federal acquisition cost or a percentage reduction from the average wholesale price for chain and independent pharmacies, with adjustments to professional fees based on the type of pharmacy dispensing the drugs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00392 appears cautiously optimistic among stakeholders. Supporters view the bill as a necessary adjustment to improve the financial viability of pharmacies participating in Medicaid programs, ensuring they are adequately compensated for the services provided. However, concerns could arise about the implications for patient access to medications and the financial pressure it might place on independent pharmacies specifically, which may struggle to adapt to the new reimbursement framework.

Contention

Some notable points of contention could concern the disparity in reimbursement rates for different types of pharmacies; chain pharmacies might benefit more than independent ones due to their larger scale and bargaining power. Additionally, there may be debates around the adequacy of professional fees and whether they reflect the true cost of dispensing medications in various healthcare settings. The effectiveness of the proposed reimbursement strategies would likely be scrutinized, particularly regarding their impact on patient care and pharmacy operations across the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB913

Pharmacy benefit managers.

CA SB362

Chain community pharmacies: quotas.

LA HB432

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations (OR +$88,000 SG EX See Note)

MS HB1125

Pharmacy services; prohibit insurers and PBMs from requiring persons to obtain exclusively through pharmacies that they own.

LA HB387

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations

CA AB401

Pharmacy: remote dispensing site pharmacy: telepharmacy: shared clinic office space.

CA AB690

Pharmacies: relocation: remote dispensing site pharmacy: pharmacy technician: qualifications.

AR SB593

To Amend The Arkansas Pharmacy Benefits Manager Licensure Act; And To Create The Pharmacy Services Administrative Organization Act.