Connecticut Senate Bill SB00449

Connecticut 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/15/12
• Refer: 3/15/12
• Report Pass: 3/28/12
• Refer: 4/9/12
• Report Pass: 4/16/12
• Refer: 4/24/12
• Report Pass: 4/25/12

Caption

An Act Concerning Municipal Water Rates.

Impact

The introduction of SB00449 represents a significant modification to existing statutes concerning municipal authority over water rates. By necessitating oversight from the PURA, the bill aligns municipal water pricing with state regulatory standards, promoting fairness and consistency across the state. This change is expected to lead to increased public trust in municipal pricing mechanisms, as communities will have the opportunity to voice their concerns at public hearings prior to any rate changes.

Summary

SB00449, titled 'An Act Concerning Municipal Water Rates,' aims to regulate how municipalities establish and alter water rates and charges. The bill stipulates that municipalities with populations exceeding 70,000 that operate municipal waterworks systems cannot implement water rate increases greater than ten percent without prior approval from the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA). This regulation seeks to ensure that rate adjustments are justifiable and transparent, ultimately protecting consumers from excessive charges.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00449 has been largely positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and constituents concerned about the rising costs of utility services. Supporters argue that requiring PURA approval for significant rate increases prevents municipal governments from imposing sudden financial burdens on residents. However, some critics suggest that the bill could hinder municipal autonomy and complicate rate-setting processes, potentially leading to delays in necessary infrastructure funding.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding SB00449 relates to the balance of power between local municipalities and state regulatory authority. Proponents emphasize the need for consumer protection, especially in larger municipalities where sudden rate hikes could have substantial impacts. Opponents, however, argue that different municipalities may have unique financial situations that require flexibility in rate-setting to ensure proper maintenance and operation of water systems.