Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05601

Introduced
1/23/13  
Introduced
1/23/13  
Refer
1/23/13  
Refer
1/23/13  
Report Pass
3/4/13  
Refer
3/11/13  
Report Pass
3/18/13  
Report Pass
3/18/13  
Engrossed
4/24/13  
Engrossed
4/24/13  
Report Pass
4/26/13  
Report Pass
4/26/13  
Chaptered
6/19/13  
Chaptered
6/19/13  
Enrolled
6/26/13  
Enrolled
6/26/13  
Passed
7/11/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Technical Revisions To The Government Administration And Elections Statutes.

Impact

The bill introduces changes that affect state laws related to election administration, particularly in refining the processes by which individuals apply for presidential ballots, and revising the definition and enforcement of lobbying activities. By reforming the ethics statutes, it aims to promote greater transparency and accountability among public officials, which could potentially enhance public trust in the political system. The revisions made by this bill are designed to streamline procedures and reduce bureaucratic complexities that may hinder effective governance.

Summary

House Bill 05601 addresses various technical revisions to the government administration and elections statutes as recommended by legislative commissioners. The bill outlines new procedures for the application of presidential ballots and amendments to statutes governing the ethics and conduct of state officials. These revisions are intended to enhance the clarity and efficiency of laws regulating the electoral process, ensuring that they meet contemporary governance needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 05601 appears largely supportive, recognizing the importance of keeping legislative frameworks up to date to respond to the evolving political environment. Legislators acknowledged the necessity of these technical adjustments to ensure better compliance and understanding among both officials and the public. However, there may also be concerns from some quarters about ensuring that such changes do not inadvertently lead to further regulatory burdens or unintended consequences for electoral participation.

Contention

While overall support for the bill is evident, there were deliberations on specific revisions, particularly around the definitions and rules of lobbying and ethics. Critics could argue that any ambiguity or perceived loopholes in the revised statutes could lead to misinterpretation or misuse. Therefore, the need for additional clarifications and potentially more robust enforcement mechanisms was underscored during discussions, ensuring legislators aim to uphold ethical standards without complicating electoral processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

CA SB997

Local control and accountability plans: parent advisory committee: student advisory committee.

CA SB335

Nursery Advisory Board.

CA AB652

Department of Pesticide Regulation Environmental Justice Advisory Committee.

CA AB382

Whole Child Model program.

CA SB220

Medi-Cal Children’s Health Advisory Panel.