Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05811

Introduced
1/24/13  
Refer
1/24/13  
Refer
2/28/13  
Refer
2/28/13  
Report Pass
3/18/13  
Report Pass
3/18/13  
Refer
3/28/13  
Refer
3/28/13  
Report Pass
4/4/13  
Report Pass
4/4/13  
Engrossed
5/15/13  
Engrossed
5/15/13  
Report Pass
5/17/13  
Report Pass
5/17/13  
Chaptered
6/3/13  
Chaptered
6/3/13  
Enrolled
6/4/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Operation Of Vessels With Electric Motors On Inland Waters Of The State.

Impact

By enabling the use of electric motors rated at one hundred six pounds of thrust or less, the bill aims to promote cleaner and quieter recreational boating options. This law is particularly notable because it specifically addresses operations during daylight hours, ensuring that traditional environmental safety measures remain in place while still encouraging the use of environmentally friendly alternatives. The bill's amendment potentially broadens access to recreational boating by simplifying requirements for a segment of boaters who utilize less powerful, eco-friendly boats.

Summary

House Bill 5811, also known as the Act Concerning the Operation of Vessels with Electric Motors on Inland Waters of the State, seeks to amend existing boating regulations concerning the operation of vessels powered exclusively by electric motors. The bill allows for the operation of such vessels on certain inland waters without the need for a valid vessel operator license or safe boating certificate under specific conditions. This legislation reflects an increasing recognition of the environmental benefits associated with electric-powered vessels, especially in areas where motorized boats can negatively impact the ecosystem.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around HB 5811 appears largely positive, with supporters highlighting the benefits of facilitating the transition to greener boating options. The bill received substantial bipartisan support, evidenced by a Senate roll call vote that resulted in 33 votes for and only 1 against. Proponents argue that such measures are essential in promoting sustainable practices and align with broader state environmental objectives, while dissenting voices may concern themselves with the implications of fewer regulations on boating safety.

Contention

While the bill promotes electric vessel operation, it also raises questions regarding enforcement and the potential for misuse of exemptions by operators in ways that could endanger safety or environmental integrity. Some stakeholders argue for the need for oversight to prevent accidents, particularly in densely populated boating areas. Nonetheless, the general agreement on the bill's objectives points toward a recognition of shifting societal values regarding environment and recreation in the legislative arena.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.