Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06438

Introduced
2/20/13  
Introduced
2/20/13  
Refer
2/20/13  
Refer
2/20/13  
Report Pass
3/4/13  
Refer
3/14/13  
Report Pass
3/20/13  
Refer
3/26/13  

Caption

An Act Restricting The Use Of Methoprene And Resmethrin.

Impact

If passed, this bill would reshape the current legal framework governing the application of larvicides for mosquito control by enforcing limitations on specific chemical usage in sensitive coastal areas. The bill mandates a comprehensive plan from the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection, which would include updated record-keeping requirements for municipalities involved in mosquito management. Furthermore, this legislation emphasizes the importance of consulting with other state departments to ensure a coordinated and scientifically informed approach, particularly as it relates to public health and environmental integrity.

Summary

House Bill 6438, titled 'An Act Restricting The Use Of Methoprene And Resmethrin,' aims to address environmental concerns related to mosquito control methods within Connecticut. Specifically, the bill seeks to prohibit the use of the chemicals methoprene and resmethrin in storm drains and conveyances under the state's coastal boundary. This legislative effort is framed within the context of safeguarding water quality and reducing potential adverse effects of these pesticides on ecosystems and public health, as mosquito-borne diseases present significant health risks.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6438 appears generally supportive among environmental and public health advocates, who welcome the restrictions on harmful chemicals. They argue that preventing methoprene and resmethrin from being used in sensitive areas is paramount to protecting local ecosystems. However, there may be concerns highlighted by local municipalities regarding the feasibility of the bill's implementation and its potential impact on effective mosquito control, which could lead to a temporary uptick in mosquito populations and associated health risks during the transition to new management practices.

Contention

A notable point of contention involves balancing effective mosquito control with environmental safety. While advocates emphasize the necessity of reducing chemical exposure in coastal waters, some stakeholders might argue that the bill could inadvertently hinder timely and efficient mosquito management strategies, which are essential for preventing outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases. As the conversation around HB 6438 unfolds, the debate will likely continue over the best practices for mosquito control and the role of state regulations in ensuring both public health and environmental safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ S2883

Requires all counties to establish mosquito control commissions and report certain mosquito control activities to State Mosquito Control Commission; requires State Mosquito Control Commission to develop guidelines to aid county commissions.

NJ A4344

Requires all counties to establish mosquito control commissions and report certain mosquito control activities to State Mosquito Control Commission; requires State Mosquito Control Commission to develop guidelines to aid county commissions.

NJ S170

Requires all counties to establish mosquito control commissions and report certain mosquito control activities to State Mosquito Control Commission; requires State Mosquito Control Commission to develop guidelines to aid county commissions.

NJ S4109

Requires establishment of pilot program for mosquito control activities by State Mosquito Control Commission for certain municipalities.

NJ A5788

Requires establishment of pilot program for mosquito control activities by State Mosquito Control Commission for certain municipalities.

CA AB718

Mosquito abatement and vector control districts: managed wetland habitat: memoranda of understanding.

CA ACR51

Mosquito Awareness Week.

CA AB2892

Pest control: mosquito abatement.