Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06690

Introduced
3/27/13  
Refer
3/27/13  
Refer
3/27/13  
Report Pass
4/16/13  
Refer
4/26/13  
Refer
4/26/13  
Report Pass
5/2/13  
Report Pass
5/2/13  
Refer
5/7/13  
Report Pass
5/14/13  
Engrossed
5/23/13  
Engrossed
5/23/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Court Proceedings And The Protection Of Animals.

Impact

The introduction of this bill is poised to significantly enhance the legal framework surrounding animal welfare in the state. By allowing for the appointing of advocates, HB 6690 evidences a commitment to the legal rights of animals in judicial proceedings, recognizing animals as entities with interests that deserve representation. The bill lays down a more involved approach to animal welfare cases, which could lead to more informed and fair outcomes in court situations involving animals.

Summary

House Bill 6690, entitled An Act Concerning Court Proceedings and the Protection of Animals, seeks to establish a system for appointing advocates in court cases concerning the welfare and custody of animals. This bill allows courts to appoint an advocate who is knowledgeable about animal welfare to represent the interests of animals in cases of violations related to animal cruelty and custody disputes. The advocate will be able to investigate the case independently and present information pertinent to the court's determination regarding the animal's best interests.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6690 appears to be largely favorable among animal rights groups and advocates, who see this measure as a progressive step towards improving protections for animals within the legal system. The bill emphasizes the importance of considering the welfare of animals in legal disputes, which is a pivotal argument among its supporters. However, there could also be concerns from some legal professionals regarding the implementation logistics and the potential impact on court resources.

Contention

While generally supported, HB 6690 may face contention regarding the practical aspects of appointing advocates, such as the training and qualifications required for these positions. There may also be debates regarding the burden of additional responsibilities placed upon the courts to manage these advocates and the potential implications for existing legal frameworks. Nonetheless, the overarching aim of fostering animal welfare and providing legal representation remains a compelling point within the discussions surrounding this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.