Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00011

Introduced
1/9/13  
Refer
1/9/13  
Refer
3/8/13  
Report Pass
3/14/13  
Refer
3/22/13  
Refer
3/22/13  
Report Pass
3/28/13  
Report Pass
3/28/13  
Engrossed
4/24/13  
Engrossed
4/24/13  
Report Pass
4/25/13  

Caption

An Act Requiring Notice Of The Reordering Of Banking Transactions.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly impact banking regulations in the state, specifically the practices related to transaction processing by financial institutions. The requirement for banks to communicate the order of transaction processing effectively increases accountability, making it more difficult for potential manipulations that could disadvantage customers, such as posting larger transactions before smaller ones to inflate overdraft fees artificially. This adjustment seeks to strengthen consumer rights within the banking sector and promote fairer business practices.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 11, titled 'An Act Requiring Notice Of The Reordering Of Banking Transactions', mandates that banks provide written notice to account-holding customers regarding the order in which they process and post transactions that occur within a single day. This legislation aims to enhance financial transparency and protect consumers by ensuring they are aware of any changes in transaction ordering that might affect their account balances and available funds. This requirement is intended to come into effect on October 1, 2013, following its approval by the Connecticut General Assembly.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00011 appears to be mostly positive, with lawmakers recognizing the importance of consumer protection in financial transactions. There is a general consensus that clearer communication regarding banking practices contributes to a more robust financial environment for consumers. However, some detractors might express concern about the potential burden this could impose on banks in terms of operational adjustments and compliance costs, although these concerns have not been prominently noted in legislative discussions.

Contention

One area of contention related to this bill is the balance between operational efficiency for banks and the need for consumer transparency. While proponents highlight the benefits of informing customers about transaction processing, some banking institutions might argue against regulations that could complicate their transaction handling processes. Nevertheless, the overarching theme seems to advocate for more informed customers who can better manage their finances with knowledge about how their transactions are processed.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05156

An Act Requiring Notices Of Rent Increases.

CT HB05143

An Act Concerning A Study Of Financial Transactions In The State.

CT HB05489

An Act Concerning Interchange Fees On Electronic Payment Transactions.

CT SB00001

An Act Concerning The Health And Safety Of Connecticut Residents.

CT SB00004

An Act Concerning Victims Of Domestic Violence, The Unsolicited Transmission Of Intimate Images By Means Of An Electronic Communication Device And The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

CT SB00435

An Act Concerning The Designation Of Farm Land And Open Space Land And Revisions To The Connecticut Entity Transactions Act.

CT SB00003

An Act Concerning Consumer Protection.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CT HB05137

An Act Concerning Funding For The City Of New Haven's Youth At Work Program.

CT SB00118

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Technical Revisions To The Banking Statutes.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.