An Act Requiring The Submission Of All Medical Malpractice Claims To Arbitration Panels.
The implementation of SB00449 is anticipated to have significant implications for both medical practitioners and patients. By mandating arbitration, the bill could potentially reduce the time and resources spent on litigation, thus expediting the resolution of claims. This may relieve some of the burdens faced by both healthcare providers and the legal system. However, there's a concern that this might limit patients' access to traditional court proceedings, where they could have more extensive legal recourse.
SB00449, introduced by Senator Boucher, proposes an amendment to chapter 900 of the general statutes requiring all medical malpractice claims to be submitted to arbitration panels. These panels would consist of a judge, a doctor, and an attorney with a medical background. This shift to an arbitration framework is aimed at replacing the current mandatory mediation process defined in section 52-190c of the general statutes. The intention behind this legislative move is to facilitate pretrial settlement of medical malpractice claims, effectively streamlining the dispute resolution process within the healthcare sector.
Opposition to the bill is likely to emerge from those who are apprehensive about the fairness and impartiality of arbitration panels compared to court trials. Critics may argue that arbitration could favor healthcare providers, as patients might feel pressured to agree to arbitration without fully understanding their rights. Additionally, there are concerns that arbitration findings may not be as transparent as court decisions, potentially leaving patients with less recourse in cases of malpractice. The discourse surrounding this bill is expected to reflect these underlying tensions between efficiency in dispute resolution and the legal rights of patients.