Connecticut Senate Bill SB00817

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/13
• Refer: 1/31/13
• Report Pass: 3/13/13
• Refer: 3/22/13
• Report Pass: 3/28/13
• Refer: 5/1/13
• Report Pass: 5/6/13
• Report Pass: 5/7/13
• Engrossed: 5/15/13
• Report Pass: 5/17/13

Caption

An Act Establishing A Property Tax Program To Encourage The Preservation Of Historic Agricultural Structures.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would impact state laws regarding property tax assessments and local government powers. It grants municipalities the authority to create criteria for the preservation easements and mandates public hearings for the approval of such applications. The intent is to balance the benefits of preserving historical sites with the potential loss of tax revenue for local governments. This approach provides an incentive for property owners to maintain historically significant agricultural buildings while contributing to the preservation of the area's cultural heritage.

Summary

SB00817 establishes a property tax program aimed at encouraging the preservation of historic agricultural structures, particularly barns and similar buildings, that are at least seventy-five years old. The bill allows municipalities to adopt a discretionary preservation easement program, which enables owners of these historic structures to apply for tax reductions based on the assessed value of their properties. The tax payment amount set under the easement can range from 25% to 75% of the standard property tax, significantly motivating property owners to maintain these structures.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB00817 appears to be positive, as it aligns with efforts to preserve local heritage and encourage responsible stewardship of historical properties. Supporters, including community members and local leaders, appreciate the potential for enhancing local tourism and educational opportunities that stem from preserved historical sites. However, there could be concerns about the financial implications for municipalities due to reduced tax revenue, leading to mixed feelings among local government officials.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential challenges and administrative burdens that may arise from the implementation of the discretionary preservation easement program. Critics may argue that the bill lacks sufficient oversight mechanisms, which could lead to inconsistent application across different municipalities. Additionally, concerns about the long-term sustainability of property tax revenues for local governments might fuel debate over the balance between preservation and economic viability.