California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2625

Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/10/22  
Refer
3/14/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Enrolled
8/8/22  
Enrolled
8/8/22  
Chaptered
8/29/22  
Chaptered
8/29/22  
Passed
8/29/22  

Caption

Subdivision Map Act: exemption: electrical energy storage system.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2625 would significantly impact state land use regulations by allowing for greater flexibility in the development of electrical energy storage systems. Local agencies would no longer be bound by the same restrictions under the Subdivision Map Act that apply to other types of land use projects. Proponents argue that this change will expedite the deployment of crucial infrastructure necessary for energy transition, while contributing to broader sustainability goals.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2625 aims to amend the Subdivision Map Act by providing an exemption for projects involving the leasing or granting of easements for electrical energy storage systems. This bill expands upon existing exemptions that already exist for solar energy systems, thereby promoting the development of energy storage solutions which are increasingly necessary for the integration of renewable energy sources. By loosening certain regulatory requirements for these projects, the bill seeks to streamline processes that can often slow down implementation, particularly in fast-evolving energy sectors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill is largely positive among supporters who view it as a proactive step towards modernizing California’s energy infrastructure. Advocates, including renewable energy groups and environmental organizations, express strong support for removing bureaucratic obstacles that hinder energy storage development. Conversely, some stakeholders voice concerns regarding the potential for reduced local oversight, arguing that this could lead to adverse impacts on community planning and environmental standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance of local and state control. Critics caution that the exemption might diminish the authority of local agencies to regulate projects based on community standards. This highlights a broader debate on how best to manage land use in a manner that harmonizes state energy goals with local governance needs. The passage of AB 2625, thus, represents a critical juncture in California's approach to integrating renewable energy while addressing local autonomy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB347

Subdivision Map Act: exemption: hydrogen fueling stations and electric vehicle charging stations.

CA AB3234

Public Safety.

CA SB1120

Subdivisions: tentative maps.

AZ SB1387

Homeowner's associations; board duties; indemnification

UT SB0104

Boundary Line Amendments

CA AB1156

Solar-use easements: suspension of Williamson Act contracts: terms of easement: termination.