Connecticut Senate Bill SB00870

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/8/13
• Refer: 2/8/13
• Report Pass: 3/13/13
• Refer: 3/25/13
• Report Pass: 4/2/13
• Refer: 4/24/13
• Report Pass: 4/30/13
• Refer: 5/8/13
• Report Pass: 5/14/13

Caption

An Act Concerning Victim Compensation.

Impact

The proposed changes would allow compensation for physical injuries, emotional harm, and for dependents of homicide victims. This expansive view of eligibility could lead to increased financial relief for more individuals affected by crime. The bill also clarifies that compensation cannot be awarded for property crimes or non-economic damages like pain and suffering, except in cases involving emotional harm. By delineating these areas, the bill attempts to streamline the application process and resources allocated for victim assistance.

Summary

SB00870, titled 'An Act Concerning Victim Compensation,' aims to amend various statutes to enhance the compensation process for victims of crime in the state. This legislation seeks to clarify who is eligible for compensation and the processes involved in applying for and receiving financial support. The bill establishes definitions for key terms such as 'victim' and 'dependent' to broaden the scope of individuals who can seek assistance, thus ensuring that more crime victims and their families can receive necessary support.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00870 appears largely supportive among advocates for victims' rights. Many stakeholders view the bill as a necessary step to address the adequacies in the current victim compensation system. However, there may be concerns regarding the limitations on compensation types that could leave some victims without adequate recourse for their suffering stemming from non-physical injuries. The overall tone reflects an understanding of the need for clarity and fairness in victim compensation laws.

Contention

A notable point of contention within discussions about SB00870 is the balance between adequately compensating victims and the potential financial burden on the state. Some lawmakers may express concerns about the sustainability of the funding required to support the enhancements proposed in the bill. Moreover, there could be debate over whether the limitations on compensation sufficiently safeguard the state's financial responsibilities while genuinely assisting victims. The outcome of these discussions could significantly influence the final shape of the legislation.