Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01069

Introduced
3/6/13  
Refer
3/6/13  
Report Pass
4/1/13  
Report Pass
4/1/13  
Refer
4/11/13  
Refer
4/11/13  
Report Pass
4/17/13  
Refer
4/24/13  
Report Pass
5/1/13  
Report Pass
5/1/13  
Report Pass
5/3/13  
Report Pass
5/3/13  
Engrossed
5/14/13  
Engrossed
5/14/13  
Report Pass
5/15/13  
Chaptered
6/6/13  
Enrolled
6/10/13  
Enrolled
6/10/13  
Passed
6/21/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Joint Practice Of Physicians And Psychologists.

Impact

If enacted, SB 01069 would amend existing statutes related to the organization and regulation of professional corporations in the state. This change would create opportunities for healthcare professionals to form entities that allow for shared governance and resource pooling, thereby facilitating a more holistic approach to patient care. The bill recognizes various licensed professionals, including physicians, psychologists, and nurse practitioners, thus broadening the scope of collaborative healthcare within a legally recognized framework. This shift not only has the potential to improve service delivery but also aims to attract more professionals into integrated practice settings.

Summary

Senate Bill 01069, known as the Act Concerning the Joint Practice of Physicians and Psychologists, aims to provide a legal framework that allows for the joint practice of health services by physicians and psychologists under a professional corporation. The bill addresses the growing need for collaborative practice in healthcare, recognizing that integrating mental health services with general medical care can greatly benefit patient outcomes. By enabling this joint practice structure, the bill seeks to enhance the delivery of comprehensive care, aligning with modern healthcare trends that emphasize interdisciplinary collaboration.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 01069 appears largely positive among healthcare advocates who argue that it will improve service delivery and patient care through collaborative models. Supporters highlight the importance of joint practice in addressing the complexities of patient health, particularly in mental health and physical health interactions. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the regulation and oversight of these joint practices, as critics worry about the potential dilution of professional standards and the challenges of ensuring quality care across different disciplines.

Contention

Key points of contention primarily revolve around the implications of joint practice on the autonomy of individual practices and how it will be regulated. While proponents view it as a necessary evolution in healthcare delivery, challenges regarding the quality of care and the management of professional liabilities remain. The bill may spark debates about the effectiveness of integrating services versus maintaining traditional, separate professional practices. As healthcare continues to evolve, balancing collaboration with professional integrity and standards will likely continue to be a focal point in discussions related to SB 01069.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06445

An Act Concerning Services That May Be Provided By Professional Corporations.

OR SB951

Relating to the practice of health care; declaring an emergency.

FL H0583

Construction Defect Claims

CT HB07340

An Act Concerning The Use Of Veil Piercing To Determine The Personal Responsibility Of An Interest Holder Of A Domestic Entity For The Debts, Obligations Or Other Liabilities Of Such Entity And The Responsibility Of A Domestic Entity For The Debts, Obligations Or Other Liabilities Of An Interest Holder Of Such Entity.

CA AB940

Recovery residences.

CA AB586

Professional fiduciaries.

CA AB615

Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery and treatment services: referrals.

NC S570

Prohibit the Corporate Practice of Medicine