Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01075

Introduced
3/6/13  
Refer
3/6/13  
Report Pass
3/19/13  
Refer
3/26/13  
Refer
3/26/13  
Report Pass
4/3/13  
Report Pass
4/3/13  
Refer
5/8/13  
Refer
5/8/13  
Report Pass
5/14/13  
Report Pass
5/14/13  
Refer
5/17/13  
Refer
5/17/13  
Report Pass
5/23/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Civil Actions Against An Employer For Failure To Pay Wages Or Compensation Or Make Payments To An Employee Welfare Fund.

Impact

The implications of SB01075 on state laws could be significant, as it alters existing statutes regarding wage enforcement. By guaranteeing employees the right to double recovery in civil actions for unpaid wages, it sends a strong message regarding employer accountability and heightens the legal risks associated with non-compliance. Additionally, the bill empowers the Labor Commissioner to take necessary legal actions to secure owed wages and employer contributions to employee welfare funds, enhancing the regulatory mechanism overseeing employer compliance.

Summary

SB01075, known as An Act Concerning Civil Actions Against An Employer For Failure To Pay Wages Or Compensation Or Make Payments To An Employee Welfare Fund, aims to enforce stronger protections for employees regarding wage payments and compensations. This legislation mandates that when an employer fails to pay wages in accordance with state laws, employees and labor organizations representing them can recover twice the amount owed through civil actions. The bill also stipulates that employers must bear the cost of legal fees if they are found at fault for wage underpayment.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB01075 has been largely supportive among labor advocates who view it as a necessary step toward ensuring fair compensation for employees. However, there are concerns from some employers about the potential for increased litigation and the financial implications of being found liable for wage discrepancies. This polarized sentiment suggests a deep-rooted conflict between protecting employee rights and the operational complexities faced by employers in adhering to these laws.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the extent of burdens placed on employers and the potential for misuse of the double recovery provision. Critics argue that the bill may lead to frivolous lawsuits, while supporters contend that it is essential for holding employers accountable and providing workers with much-needed financial recourse. As the bill progresses, discussions are likely to center on balancing employee protections with employer concerns regarding compliance and the risks of litigation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.