Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01143

Introduced
3/15/13  
Introduced
3/15/13  
Refer
3/15/13  
Refer
3/15/13  
Report Pass
4/16/13  
Report Pass
4/16/13  
Refer
4/29/13  
Refer
4/29/13  
Report Pass
5/6/13  
Report Pass
5/6/13  
Engrossed
5/15/13  
Report Pass
5/17/13  
Report Pass
5/17/13  
Chaptered
5/29/13  
Chaptered
5/29/13  
Enrolled
5/30/13  
Enrolled
5/30/13  
Passed
6/5/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Traffic Stop Information.

Impact

The implementation of SB 1143 is expected to enhance the protection of civil rights during traffic enforcement by providing a framework for police departments to evaluate their practices around stops and searches. The bill specifies that each department must gather and maintain records including demographic data on individuals stopped as well as the nature of the stop and its outcomes. The Office of Policy and Management is tasked with reviewing this data, reporting findings, and possibly recommending penalties for non-compliance, thereby ensuring ongoing oversight of police practices and greater accountability in cases of misconduct.

Summary

Senate Bill 1143, entitled 'An Act Concerning Traffic Stop Information,' introduces significant changes to the recording and reporting processes related to traffic stops by police departments in the state. The bill mandates that all municipal police departments, along with the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, establish written policies preventing traffic stops motivated solely by race, color, ethnicity, age, gender, or sexual orientation, thus aiming to reduce instances of racial profiling in law enforcement. Furthermore, it requires the development of a standardized method for collecting and reporting data regarding traffic stops, thereby facilitating transparency and accountability in policing practices.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 1143 appeared supportive among advocates for civil rights and police reform, who view it as a crucial step towards addressing and mitigating racial profiling in traffic enforcement. However, some law enforcement representatives expressed concern about the additional administrative burdens imposed by the bill, suggesting that such requirements might detract from valuable policing activities. Notably, community activists emphasized that the successful implementation of this legislation is vital for rebuilding trust between police and the communities they serve.

Contention

The most notable points of contention regarding SB 1143 included debates over the specifics of how data would be collected and reported, as well as concerns from law enforcement groups about the adequacy of funding and support for the necessary training and implementation processes. Furthermore, questions arose about the balance between ensuring police accountability and not hindering effective law enforcement operations. The bill's passage reflects an evolving landscape of policing policies, illustrating the tensions between public safety, civil rights, and the operational realities faced by police departments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1081

After School Education and Safety Program: funding: authorized purposes.

CA AB1051

Education finance: state special schools and diagnostic centers.

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA SB527

Education finance: local control funding formula: home-to-school transportation: cost-of-living adjustment.

CA AB2434

County government: allocation of state funds.

CA AB898

Criminal records: automatic conviction record relief.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.

NJ S1199

Creates new $100 assessment for convictions of certain sexual offenses to fund counseling for victims and their families; establishes Sexual Offender Victim Counseling Fund.