Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05491

Introduced
3/5/14  
Refer
3/5/14  
Refer
3/5/14  
Report Pass
3/18/14  
Report Pass
3/18/14  
Refer
3/26/14  
Refer
3/26/14  
Report Pass
4/1/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning Customer Sales And Service Calls Made From Outside The United States.

Impact

This bill is set to enhance consumer protection by increasing transparency and giving residents more control over their interactions with customer service centers. By obligating companies to provide a clear disclosure about the location of their representatives, it empowers consumers to make informed decisions about whether they wish to continue the conversation or switch to a local representative. This move, effective July 1, 2014, aligns with growing concerns about privacy and the handling of personal information when dealing with international call centers.

Summary

House Bill 5491, titled 'An Act Concerning Customer Sales and Service Calls Made from Outside the United States,' aims to regulate the practices of customer service centers operating outside of the U.S. The bill mandates that any business conducting operations in Connecticut must ensure that customer service representatives disclose their location within the first thirty seconds of a call. If the representative is working outside the U.S., they must inform the caller that sensitive personal information may be required and allow the caller the option to transfer the call to a U.S.-based representative.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5491 appears to be largely positive among consumer protection advocates, who see it as a necessary step in safeguarding personal information and addressing consumer concerns regarding outsourced customer service. However, there may be some contention from business interests, particularly those who may view the requirements as an additional regulatory burden that could complicate their operations, especially for smaller companies.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about potential increased costs for businesses to comply with the new regulations, as well as concerns about the ease of transferring calls back to U.S.-based support. Some critics argue that while the intent of the bill is positive, the practical implications may hinder service efficiency and raise operational costs for companies relying heavily on overseas labor. The balance between consumer rights and business operational efficiency continues to be a key discussion point regarding this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA SB1339

Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act; telephone solicitations by text message, effective date.

CA AB1231

Telecommunications: combining lifeline, federal lifeline, and federal Affordable Connectivity Program subsidies.

NC H936

Robocall Solicitation Modifications

CA SB716

Lifeline program: broadband internet access service.

CA AB1588

Telecommunications: duties of local exchange carriers.

CA AB2808

Primary ticket sellers.

CA AB2885

False campaign speech and online platform disclosures.

CA SB1272

Crimes: intercepting telephone communications.