Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05524

Introduced
3/6/14  
Introduced
3/6/14  
Refer
3/6/14  
Refer
3/6/14  
Report Pass
4/2/14  
Report Pass
4/2/14  
Refer
4/11/14  
Refer
4/11/14  
Report Pass
4/17/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Law Revision Commission With Respect To The Alimony Statutes.

Impact

The bill seeks to clarify the criteria used by courts in determining alimony payments and property assignments during divorce proceedings. It introduces specific guidelines for how the court should evaluate evidence presented by each party, addressing factors like income, liabilities, and ages of the spouses. A significant aspect of the bill is the adjustment of the burden of proof in modification cases, particularly concerning retirees over the age of sixty-five. This will enable courts to make more informed decisions regarding the sustainability of alimony payments and can lead to alterations based on substantial changes in circumstances.

Summary

House Bill 05524, also known as the Act Concerning the Recommendations of the Law Revision Commission with Respect to the Alimony Statutes, aims to revise and modernize the alimony laws in Connecticut. This legislation emphasizes the Superior Court's authority to assign property and financial responsibilities during divorce and legal separation proceedings, incorporating various considerations such as the length of marriage, health status, and future earning capacity of each spouse. The changes take effect on October 1, 2014, and will impact how alimony decisions are made by the court, aiming for a more equitable approach to financial support post-marriage dissolution.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05524 appears largely supportive among lawmakers who view these changes as necessary to improve the fairness and effectiveness of family law in the state. Proponents argue that these revisions provide clarity and better align the law with contemporary societal norms concerning marriage and financial responsibility after separation. However, there may also be concerns from those who worry about the potential burden placed on the receiving spouses, particularly if adjustments to alimony are structured too rigidly.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the adjustments made to the standards for modifying alimony agreements, particularly regarding age and retirement status. The burden of proof shifts depending on the circumstances under which a modification is sought, which could lead to disputes regarding the fairness of the alimony amounts determined by the court. Some legislators have expressed anxiety about whether these changes adequately protect vulnerable spouses, especially older individuals who may find re-entering the workforce challenging. The future implementation of these changes will likely reveal how effectively they address the balance between fairness for both parties involved in a divorce.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1200

Enforcement of judgments: renewal and interest.

CA SB642

Civil actions: renewal of judgments.

CA SB261

Division of Labor Standards Enforcement: orders, decisions, and awards.

CA SB616

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

CA SB298

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

CA AB2339

Deferred entry of judgment.

CA SB1477

Enforcement of judgments: wage garnishment.

CA SB383

Juveniles: informal supervision: deferred entry of judgment.