Connecticut Senate Bill SB00043

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/14
• Refer: 2/7/14
• Report Pass: 3/4/14
• Refer: 3/12/14
• Report Pass: 3/18/14
• Refer: 3/26/14
• Report Pass: 3/31/14
• Refer: 4/1/14
• Report Pass: 4/8/14
• Refer: 4/9/14
• Report Pass: 4/14/14
• Report Pass: 4/16/14
• Engrossed: 5/1/14
• Report Pass: 5/2/14

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Department Of Children And Families Statutes.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would have significant implications for state laws related to child welfare. It will facilitate more structured and timely reviews of permanency plans for children in foster care, ensuring that their needs are addressed more proactively. The requirement for screenings of developmental and social-emotional delays in young children will help catch potential issues early on, potentially leading to better outcomes for vulnerable youths. The enhanced obligations for the Department of Children and Families are aimed at improving the overall service delivery and support to the children and families involved in the system.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 43 focuses on revisions to the statutes governing the Department of Children and Families. The bill aims to enhance the processes surrounding permanency planning for children in foster care. It mandates that the commissioner file a motion for the review of a permanency plan for each child within ten months of their voluntary admission into care, and subsequently on an annual basis. The legislation emphasizes the importance of formulating plans that prioritize the health and safety of children while considering their need for a stable and permanent living environment.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB00043 appears to be supportive with recognition of the need for better child welfare practices. Advocates for children and families have expressed approval of the structured approach to permanency planning, arguing that it serves the best interests of children. However, some concerns remain regarding the implementation of the bill and whether the resources will be adequate to meet the increased requirements imposed on child welfare services.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the logistics of executing the mandated screenings and the realities of providing timely reviews of permanency plans. Additionally, there may be debates over the adequacy of funding and resources for the Department of Children and Families to carry out these new requirements effectively. While the intentions of the legislation are aligned with improving child welfare outcomes, the legislative discussions emphasize ensuring that the systems are in place to fulfill these enhanced obligations.