Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00196

Introduced
2/19/14  
Refer
2/19/14  
Report Pass
3/20/14  
Refer
3/28/14  
Report Pass
4/3/14  
Engrossed
5/2/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning Group-wide Supervision For Internationally Active Insurance Groups.

Impact

The bill is likely to have a significant impact on existing state laws governing insurance regulation. It introduces new responsibilities for the Insurance Commissioner to cooperate with other jurisdictions and recognize their supervisory officials when appropriate. Moreover, it permits the commissioner to gather comprehensive data from internationally active insurance groups, thereby improving the state's ability to monitor financial conditions and potential enterprise risks. This broadens the regulatory authority and aligns Connecticut with interstate and national initiatives to strengthen insurance oversight.

Summary

SB00196, regarding group-wide supervision for internationally active insurance groups, seeks to establish a framework allowing the Insurance Commissioner of Connecticut to act as a group-wide supervisor. This is particularly targeted at insurance groups that have significant operations both in Connecticut and globally. By enabling the commissioner to coordinate supervisory activities, the bill aims to enhance the regulation and oversight of insurance companies that operate across jurisdictions. This regulatory approach is consistent with national efforts to better manage the risks posed by large insurance entities and their affiliated systems.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00196 appears to be supportive among the insurance industry stakeholders and regulatory bodies, as it aims to improve regulatory clarity and cooperation. Key proponents argue that the enhanced supervision will protect policyholders and ensure financial stability within the insurance market. However, there may be concern regarding the increased regulatory burden on companies, prompting discussions on balancing oversight with operational flexibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for conflicts with regulations in other jurisdictions and the concerns of smaller insurance companies about the resources needed to comply with increased oversight requirements. Additionally, the ability of the commissioner to determine appropriate group-wide supervisors could lead to debates on jurisdictional authority and cooperation standards among states. These discussions highlight the ongoing balancing act between effective regulation and supporting industry growth.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00023

An Act Concerning Group-wide Supervision For Internationally Active Insurance Groups.

LA HB255

Provides relative to the authority of the commissioner of insurance to supervise insurance holding company systems

TX HB3220

Relating to the regulation of insurance holding company systems, including internationally active insurance groups; authorizing a fee.

TX SB1071

Relating to the regulation of insurance holding company systems, including internationally active insurance groups; authorizing a fee.

CT HB05382

An Act Concerning The Insurance Holding Company Act.

MN HF2601

Maximum interest rate for certain loans and contracts for deed modified.

MN SF2794

Certain loans and contract for deed maximum interest rate modification provision, group capital calculations for insurers establishments, Insurers completion of NAIC liquidity stress test requirement provision, and insurers filing group capital calculations and results from the NAIC liquidity stress test requirement provision, and insurers securing a deposit or bond requirement provision

NM SB277

Insurance Holding Company Law Changes