Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00295

Introduced
2/26/14  
Introduced
2/26/14  
Refer
2/26/14  
Refer
2/26/14  
Report Pass
3/10/14  
Refer
3/18/14  
Report Pass
3/25/14  
Refer
4/8/14  
Refer
4/8/14  
Report Pass
4/14/14  
Report Pass
4/16/14  
Engrossed
4/23/14  
Engrossed
4/23/14  
Report Pass
4/25/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Department Of Public Health's Recommendation Regarding Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity.

Impact

If enacted, SB00295 would modify the existing legal framework around sovereign immunity in Connecticut, potentially leading to increased liability for the Department of Public Health. Advocates for the bill argue that it will enhance accountability of state agencies, making them more responsible for their actions, especially in the realm of public health. This change may create a broader avenue for citizens to seek justice and reparation in instances where state actions may have caused harm or neglect in public health matters.

Summary

SB00295, referred to as an Act Concerning the Department of Public Health's Recommendation Regarding Waiver of Sovereign Immunity, proposes significant changes to how the state interacts with its public health laws. The core aspect of the bill involves the repeal of Section 19a-24 of the general statutes, which suggests a re-evaluation of sovereign immunity concerning public health matters. This may lead to changes in the protections that state agencies and their employees enjoy against being sued in civil court, particularly in scenarios involving public health issues.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00295 is mixed, with strong arguments from both supporters and opponents. Supporters view the bill as a necessary reform that will foster greater transparency and accountability within public health agencies. Detractors, however, express concerns that weakening sovereign immunity might expose the state to frivolous lawsuits, thus impacting the operational effectiveness and financial stability of these public health entities.

Contention

Key points of contention revolve around the repercussions this bill may have on the balance between necessary legal protections for public agencies and the rights of individuals to seek recourse for grievances against the state. Opponents fear that while it intends to improve accountability, it could also lead to administrative challenges, with public health officials potentially facing increased litigation that could distract them from their core mission of maintaining public health standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05291

An Act Concerning The Department Of Public Health's Recommendations Regarding Improved Opioid Monitoring.

CT HB05292

An Act Concerning The Department Of Developmental Services' Recommendations Regarding Community Companion Homes.

CT SB00242

An Act Concerning The Office Of Health Strategy's Recommendations Regarding The All-payer Claims Database.

CT SB00241

An Act Concerning The Office Of Health Strategy's Recommendations Regarding 340b Program Transparency.

CT HB05316

An Act Concerning The Office Of Health Strategy's Recommendations Regarding The Certificate Of Need Program.

CT HB05235

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Cannabis Regulation.

CT HB05293

An Act Concerning The Department Of Developmental Services' Recommendations Regarding Various Revisions To Developmental Services Statutes.

CT SB00202

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Prescription Drug Control.

CT SB00127

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Department Of Children And Families Relating To Background Checks, Certain Subsidies, Urgent Crisis Centers, Departmental Records And Special Police Officers.

CT HB05234

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Alcoholic Liquor Regulation.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.