Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00389

Introduced
3/4/14  
Refer
3/4/14  
Report Pass
4/1/14  
Report Pass
4/1/14  
Refer
4/11/14  
Refer
4/11/14  
Report Pass
4/17/14  
Report Pass
4/17/14  
Refer
4/22/14  
Refer
4/22/14  
Report Pass
4/24/14  
Report Pass
4/24/14  
Report Pass
4/25/14  
Report Pass
4/25/14  
Engrossed
5/6/14  
Engrossed
5/6/14  
Report Pass
5/7/14  
Report Pass
5/7/14  
Chaptered
5/22/14  
Chaptered
5/22/14  
Enrolled
5/29/14  
Enrolled
5/29/14  
Passed
6/13/14  

Caption

An Act Concerning Court Operations.

Impact

This bill significantly impacts state laws related to the operational authority and administrative procedures of the judiciary. It modifies the duties and qualifications of state marshals and allows for more flexibility in handling certain court matters, including changing how venues are determined for hearing cases. The proposed amendments aim to facilitate a more prompt and efficient administration of justice, particularly in family relations and other pertinent sectors of the judicial system.

Summary

Senate Bill 389, titled 'An Act Concerning Court Operations', aims to amend various statutes related to the functioning and administration of the judicial system in Connecticut. The bill introduces changes that affect the roles of state marshals, the processing of court cases, and the handling of certain legal documents. By streamlining procedures and adjusting the jurisdictional boundaries of the courts, the legislation is designed to enhance efficiency within the court systems while also addressing specific operational concerns that have arisen in recent years.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 389 appears largely positive among legislators and judicial officials, who view the changes as necessary improvements for the functioning of the courts. Supporters argue that the proposed amendments will alleviate significant operational burdens that currently hinder court efficiency. However, there remains a cautious perspective regarding the implications of changing established procedures and the potential for increased administrative complexity.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from some advocacy groups regarding the potential for these changes to adversely affect vulnerable populations involved in family court cases. Critics fear that streamlining processes may compromise thoroughness in case evaluations and diminish the quality of court oversight. Nevertheless, proponents contend that these adjustments will ultimately serve to enhance judicial services and expedite case resolutions, thereby benefiting all parties involved in the legal system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00964

An Act Concerning Court Operations.

CT HB07255

An Act Concerning Judicial Branch Operations And Procedures And The Duties Of Judicial Branch Personnel.

CT HB07130

An Act Concerning Probate Court Operations.

CT SB00426

An Act Concerning Court Operations And Administrative Proceedings.

CT SB00488

An Act Concerning Grand Jury Reform.

CT HB06698

An Act Concerning Grand Jury Reform.

CT HB07257

An Act Concerning Grand Jury Reform.

CT SB00484

An Act Concerning Grand Jury Reform.