Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05468

Introduced
1/16/15  
Introduced
1/16/15  
Refer
1/16/15  

Caption

An Act Requiring Municipal Electric Utilities To Return Unused Corporate Security Deposit Funds.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5468 would amend Title 7 of the general statutes, specifically related to electricity regulation. This adjustment represents a significant shift toward ensuring that municipal electric utilities operate with higher standards of financial responsibility. The bill is expected to have direct economic benefits as it would potentially lower costs for consumers who otherwise might not receive refunds for unused deposits. This can lead to increased consumer satisfaction and a more favorable perception of municipal utilities, thereby influencing how these entities allocate resources and manage customer funds in the future.

Summary

House Bill 5468 focuses on municipal electric utilities and mandates that they return any unused corporate security deposit funds. This legislation aims to enhance financial accountability within these utilities by ensuring that customers are not overcharged for services. By requiring the return of surplus funds, the bill seeks to promote transparency in the management of corporate security deposits and bolster customer trust in municipal utilities. It represents an effort to create a fairer financial framework for utility customers who may have previously been left in the dark regarding the handling of their security deposits.

Contention

There may be discussions or concerns regarding the operational impacts on municipal electric utilities, particularly concerning how they manage and allocate funds associated with corporate security deposits. Stakeholders, including utility managers and legislators, might analyze the implications of the bill in terms of administrative burden and compliance costs. Ensuring prompt refunds of unused deposits could necessitate additional accounting practices and potentially intensify regulatory scrutiny, leading to debates about the balance between consumer protection and operational efficiency.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.