Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06568

Introduced
1/26/15  
Introduced
1/26/15  
Refer
1/26/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Payments In Lieu Of Taxes To Municipalities With General Aviation Airports Managed By The Connecticut Airport Authority.

Impact

The implementation of HB 06568 would significantly impact the financial landscape for municipalities housing general aviation airports. By guaranteeing cities and towns this PILOT funding, the bill aims to stabilize their budgets and ensure that essential public services can be maintained despite potential losses in property tax revenues. This will foster economic stability in affected areas, as municipalities will have a clear expectation of funds that can be anticipated for their fiscal planning.

Summary

House Bill 06568 seeks to amend existing statutes to ensure that the state of Connecticut compensates municipalities for property taxes that are exempted due to the presence of general aviation airports managed by the Connecticut Airport Authority. The bill mandates that the state will make payments in lieu of taxes (PILOT) to these municipalities, equal to 100% of the property taxes that would have normally been assessed but for the exemptions provided to the airports. This measure aims to ease the financial burden on local governments that lose tax revenue because of these airport exemptions.

Contention

While the bill serves to protect municipal finances, it may also face scrutiny regarding the source of funding for these state payments. Critics may raise concerns about the sustainability of the state’s budget when it comes to fulfilling these PILOT commitments. Additionally, questions may arise about equity and fairness in funding across different municipalities, particularly if some towns with airports receive substantial financial benefits while others do not.

Notable_points

Supporters of the bill argue that it rectifies a longstanding issue where municipalities are unduly affected by tax exemptions that local residents do not benefit from directly. Conversely, opponents may argue that this approach could strain state resources or foster dependency on state funding, thus limiting local governments' incentive to diversify their revenue sources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.