Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06685

Introduced
2/2/15  
Introduced
2/2/15  
Refer
2/2/15  
Refer
2/2/15  
Report Pass
3/5/15  
Refer
3/13/15  
Refer
3/13/15  
Report Pass
3/19/15  

Caption

An Act Increasing Home Care Provider Rates.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would have a significant impact on state laws regarding funding for home care services under the Connecticut home-care program for the elderly. It aims to establish a more equitable payment structure, ensuring that providers can adequately serve their clients without compromising the quality of care due to financial constraints. This adjustment in fees is anticipated to improve service availability and enhance the overall standard of care in the home care sector, catering specifically to the needs of the elderly and those requiring support services.

Summary

House Bill 06685 aims to increase the rates paid to home care providers by the state for services rendered to the elderly. The legislation seeks to address the financial challenges faced by home health care agencies and homemaker-home health aide agencies, ensuring that they receive reasonable compensation for the care they provide. It stipulates that the Department of Social Services will establish and adjust these rates based on the costs of delivering necessary services, which is crucial for maintaining access to care for vulnerable populations in Connecticut.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB06685 appears to be positive, especially among advocates for the elderly and healthcare providers who argue that increasing these rates is essential for the sustainability of home care services. Supporters believe that the bill represents a critical step forward in recognizing the value of home care providers and ensuring that they are fairly compensated. However, the bill's implications for budget allocations might raise concerns among budget-focused legislators, leading to discussions about financial feasibility and long-term funding strategies.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB06685 might include debates over the specific rate increases proposed and how they align with the state's budgetary constraints. Legislators may express differing views on how to balance the need for increased funding for home care with other state priorities. Additionally, stakeholders might highlight varying perspectives on the adequacy of the proposed payment structures, debate the historical context of home care funding, and examine the potential administrative challenges involved in implementing the new fee schedule.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB5190

Drains: other; definition of per diem and compensation for drainage boards; modify. Amends secs. 72, 384, 441, 464 & 515 of 1956 PA 40 (MCL 280.72 et seq.).

CA SB306

Retaliation actions: complaints: administrative review.

CA SB1384

Labor Commissioner: financially disabled persons: representation.

CA AB1947

Employment violation complaints: requirements: time.

CA AB403

Division of Labor Standards Enforcement: complaint.

CA AB2946

Division of Labor Standards Enforcement: complaint.

CA AB2142

Insurance: home protection companies.

NJ A2113

Requires initial Medicaid and NJ FamilyCare eligibility determinations to be made not later than 21 days following application submission; provides that NJ FamilyCare coverage is terminated whenever required premium is not paid for three consecutive months.