Connecticut House Bill HB06833

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/15
• Refer: 2/19/15
• Report Pass: 3/10/15
• Refer: 3/17/15
• Report Pass: 3/24/15
• Engrossed: 5/6/15
• Report Pass: 5/8/15
• Chaptered: 6/2/15
• Enrolled: 6/10/15
• Passed: 6/19/15

Caption

An Act Concerning The Qualifications And Duties Of The Executive Director Of The Office Of Military Affairs.

Impact

The enactment of this legislation is expected to enhance the state's ability to coordinate efforts concerning military facilities and defense industries. By empowering a qualified executive director, Connecticut aims to improve its engagement with federal military processes, particularly the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process. This could lead to better advocacy for the retention and growth of military installations in the state, which is vital for local economies and national defense interests.

Summary

House Bill 06833, also known as Public Act No. 15-65, focuses on the qualifications and responsibilities of the Executive Director of the Office of Military Affairs in Connecticut. The bill mandates that the executive director be appointed by the Governor in consultation with the Commissioner of Economic and Community Development and that they possess prior military experience, preferably having attained the rank of field grade or senior officer. This ensures that the individual leading military affairs in Connecticut has firsthand knowledge and experience, which is crucial for addressing the needs of the state's military facilities and personnel.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 06833 appears to be supportive, particularly among military and defense advocates in Connecticut. The modification of the executive director's qualifications underscores the state's commitment to effectively managing military affairs and ensuring that military personnel and their families receive the necessary support and resources. Additionally, the bill reflects a proactive approach to military facility management, which is crucial for sustaining the state's military presence.

Contention

While there may not have been significant opposition to the bill, discussions may revolve around how the preferences for military experience could limit the pool of candidates eligible for the role of executive director. Stakeholders might express concerns regarding the bill's emphasis on military background possibly overshadowing other valuable qualifications such as management experience or expertise in civilian defense-related issues. Nonetheless, the strategic positioning of the executive director is seen as essential for advocating the state's interests in military affairs.