Connecticut House Bill HB06853

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/15
• Refer: 2/19/15
• Report Pass: 3/6/15
• Refer: 3/13/15
• Report Pass: 3/19/15
• Refer: 5/13/15
• Report Pass: 5/19/15
• Engrossed: 5/20/15
• Report Pass: 5/22/15
• Chaptered: 6/15/15
• Enrolled: 6/18/15
• Passed: 7/2/15

Caption

An Act Concerning Grants Available Through The Intertown Capital Equipment Purchase Incentive Program.

Impact

The implementation of HB06853 is expected to directly impact municipalities by providing financial support for the procurement of essential equipment and vehicles. By allowing for joint acquisitions through grant support, the legislation seeks to reduce the financial burden on individual municipalities and promote cooperative purchasing strategies. This initiative can ultimately enhance operational efficiency in local governments, helping them to better fulfill their service obligations.

Summary

House Bill 06853, titled 'An Act Concerning Grants Available Through The Intertown Capital Equipment Purchase Incentive Program,' is designed to facilitate the acquisition of necessary equipment and vehicles by municipalities in Connecticut. The bill authorizes the issuance of bonds amounting to up to twenty million dollars, with part of the funds specifically earmarked to provide grants that can cover up to 80% of the total acquisition costs of eligible items. The program aims to encourage municipalities to collaborate on equipment purchases or leases to enhance the delivery of governmental services.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB06853 appears to be largely positive, with support from various stakeholders who recognize the benefits of facilitating local governments in obtaining the required tools for effective service delivery. Municipal leaders have praised the program for its potential to foster collaboration, while budget-conscious parties appreciate the grant system that mitigates fiscal constraints in equipment purchasing. However, there are concerns regarding the effective administration of the program and whether the funds can adequately meet the needs of all municipalities.

Contention

While there is broad support for the concept of providing grants for municipal equipment acquisition, contention may arise surrounding the prioritization of funds and the specific criteria for grant allocation. Some fears include a lack of transparency in how the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management will administer the grant application process and the potential for certain municipalities to be favored over others. Legislators and advocates for less well-off areas may push for clearer guidelines that ensure equitable access to the funds.