An Act Concerning Service Pipes Of Water Companies.
Impact
The enactment of HB 6994 impacts state laws related to the regulation of water companies and their service responsibilities to customers. It mandates that water companies are accountable for ensuring all replacement and repair work on service connections is performed at their cost. This change is significant as it emphasizes company liability and supports the effective functioning of water delivery systems, while likely reducing the financial burden on property owners when such repairs are required.
Summary
House Bill 6994, titled 'An Act Concerning Service Pipes of Water Companies', primarily addresses the responsibilities of water companies regarding service connections and service pipes. The bill establishes the definitions for 'service connection' and 'service pipe', clarifying the obligations of water companies to replace and repair service connections for properties with annual revenues of twenty thousand dollars or more. By shifting the financial responsibility for such repairs and replacements onto the water companies, the bill aims to improve service reliability and ensure proper infrastructure maintenance.
Sentiment
The sentiment towards HB 6994 appears to be generally positive, particularly among proponents of improved water infrastructure and accountability from service providers. Advocates argue that the bill is a necessary measure to strengthen the reliability of water services and protect the interests of property owners. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the implementation of this responsibility and whether water companies are fully equipped to handle these increased duties, which could lead to discussions about funding and resource allocation.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the provisions that allow property owners to request exceptions for service pipe placements that cross intervening properties. This aspect raises concerns regarding property rights and the potential for disputes between water companies and property owners over easements and compliance with company regulations. Critics may argue that while the bill aims to provide clarity, it does not fully address the complexities that can arise in cases of property line disputes or unusual geographical considerations.
An Act Concerning Funding For Community Access Television, The Connecticut Television Network And Low-income Internet Access And Taxation Of Communications Services Providers.