Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07060

Introduced
4/16/15  
Introduced
4/16/15  
Refer
4/16/15  
Refer
4/16/15  
Report Pass
4/30/15  
Report Pass
4/30/15  
Refer
5/8/15  
Refer
5/8/15  
Report Pass
5/14/15  
Report Pass
5/14/15  
Engrossed
5/27/15  
Report Pass
5/30/15  
Report Pass
5/30/15  
Chaptered
6/16/15  
Chaptered
6/16/15  
Enrolled
6/18/15  
Enrolled
6/18/15  
Passed
7/2/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Failure To File For Certain Tax Exemptions, The Extension Of Certain Tax Credits And Development Programs, Exemptions From Certain Financial Assistance And Admissions Tax Requirements, And Validations.

Impact

The bill facilitates significant changes in state statutes related to property tax and admission tax. For instance, individuals who missed application deadlines for specific exemptions in towns such as Windsor and North Branford can file for these exemptions within a 30-day window after the bill's effective date, ensuring they are not disproportionately taxed due to administrative oversights. This is particularly important for fostering an encouraging business climate where compliance is manageable, thereby promoting economic development in various municipalities.

Summary

House Bill 07060, titled 'An Act Concerning The Failure To File For Certain Tax Exemptions, The Extension Of Certain Tax Credits And Development Programs, Exemptions From Certain Financial Assistance And Admissions Tax Requirements, And Validations', seeks to provide leniencies and extensions regarding the filing deadlines for tax exemptions and financial assistance for local municipalities. It specifically aims to benefit individuals and businesses that may have missed deadlines for claiming exemptions, allowing them an opportunity to regain what they are entitled to under state law.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 07060 is favorable, with legislators recognizing the importance of supporting constituents and businesses in navigating the complexities of tax regulations. The extension provided is seen as a remedy rather than an entitlement, appealing broadly across party lines as it seeks to aid communities in managing their tax responsibilities more effectively. However, there may be concerns from financial oversight bodies regarding potential revenue impacts from extended exemptions and their long-term sustainability.

Contention

While proponents laud the bill as a necessary adjustment for fairness, critics may argue that such allowances could encourage laxity in filing for exemptions or undermine the intention behind strict deadlines. The debate occasionally reflects a broader discourse on state intervention versus local autonomy, especially concerning fiscal management. However, the bill's structure suggests a focus on rectifying past delays rather than future complacencies, indicating an intention to support local governments in their administrative functions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2985

Property taxation.

CA SB812

Property taxation: tax-defaulted property sales: minimum price.

CA AB1583

Property taxation: equalized assessment roll: aircrafts.

CA SB364

Change in ownership: nonresidential active solar energy systems: initiative.

CA AB873

Department of Food and Agriculture: commercial cannabis activity inspectors: peace officer duties.

CA SB51

Surplus residential property.

CA AB1112

Tax Equity Allocation.

CA AB1906

Voluntary stream restoration: property owner liability: indemnification: claims.