Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00193

Introduced
1/20/15  
Introduced
1/20/15  
Refer
1/20/15  
Refer
1/20/15  
Refer
3/10/15  
Refer
3/10/15  
Report Pass
3/23/15  
Report Pass
3/23/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Report Pass
4/2/15  
Report Pass
4/2/15  
Engrossed
4/14/15  
Engrossed
4/14/15  
Report Pass
4/15/15  
Report Pass
4/15/15  
Chaptered
6/3/15  
Chaptered
6/3/15  
Enrolled
6/10/15  
Enrolled
6/10/15  
Passed
6/19/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Administration Of Hair Follicle Drug Testing By Clinical Laboratories.

Impact

The enactment of SB00193 impacts state laws by adding new requirements for clinical laboratories, thereby clarifying the obligations of these entities in relation to drug testing. This bill symbolizes a move toward standardizing testing practices and enhancing provider authority in clinical decision-making. It is particularly significant as it supports healthcare professionals' roles in determining appropriate testing for patients without undue restrictions from laboratories. Furthermore, this regulation may promote higher rates of compliance among laboratories in administering tests as ordered by qualified medical personnel.

Summary

SB00193, known as the act concerning the administration of hair follicle drug testing, establishes regulations for clinical laboratories offering this specific type of drug testing. The main provision mandates that no laboratory can refuse to administer a hair follicle drug test ordered by licensed healthcare professionals, including physicians, physician assistants, and advanced practice registered nurses. This law aims to ensure that patients are able to receive necessary testing based on professional recommendations, thereby improving access to these diagnostic services.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding SB00193 has been positive among healthcare professionals and patient advocacy groups, who see it as beneficial for ensuring that patients can access crucial testing services. Supporters argue that this bill empowers the medical community and facilitates timely interventions for patients. However, there may be some concerns from laboratories regarding the implications of being required to perform tests, which could lead to operational and compliance challenges.

Contention

While the bill has generally been well-received, discussions have arisen about operational implications for clinical laboratories, particularly concerning the cost and logistics of complying with the new requirements. Some stakeholders may express the view that it imposes additional burdens on laboratories without providing proportionate benefits to patient care. Nonetheless, the prevailing view emphasizes the need for unfettered access to medical testing as a critical component of healthcare.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.