Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00257

Introduced
1/21/15  
Introduced
1/21/15  
Refer
1/21/15  
Refer
1/21/15  
Refer
2/13/15  
Refer
2/13/15  
Report Pass
3/25/15  
Report Pass
3/25/15  
Refer
3/31/15  
Refer
3/31/15  
Report Pass
4/8/15  
Report Pass
4/8/15  
Engrossed
4/14/15  
Engrossed
4/14/15  
Report Pass
4/15/15  
Report Pass
4/15/15  
Chaptered
4/24/15  
Chaptered
4/24/15  
Enrolled
5/5/15  
Enrolled
5/5/15  
Passed
5/11/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Reporting Of Payments By Manufacturers To Independently-practicing Advanced Practice Registered Nurses.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws governing the financial interactions between medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers and healthcare providers. It repeals existing laws that may not adequately address the growing concerns about conflicts of interest and transparency in the healthcare system. By creating requirements for yearly reporting of financial transactions, the bill aims to enhance regulatory oversight and empower consumers to make informed choices about their healthcare providers based on potential influences from these manufacturers.

Summary

Senate Bill 257, also known as the Act Concerning Reporting of Payments by Manufacturers to Independently-Practicing Advanced Practice Registered Nurses, aims to introduce transparency in the healthcare sector by requiring manufacturers of drugs and medical devices to report payments or other transfers of value made to advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) who practice independently, meaning not in collaboration with a physician. By mandating these disclosures, the bill seeks to ensure that patients and the public are informed about potential influences on healthcare providers' decisions, fostering a culture of accountability and trust within the medical community.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 257 appears predominantly positive, particularly among advocates for healthcare transparency and ethical practices. Supporters argue that the requirement for manufacturers to disclose payments will help to safeguard patient interests and promote responsible behavior among APRNs. However, there may also be concerns from opponents regarding the burden of reporting necessitated by the bill, which some may perceive as excessive or regulatory overreach. Nonetheless, the push for transparency is a recurring theme in the discussions around this bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about the balance between regulation and the autonomy of healthcare providers. While many stakeholders agree on the importance of transparency, there are arguments regarding how these reporting requirements may affect APRNs' relationships with manufacturers, potentially limiting access to necessary medical supplies or device innovations. Furthermore, discussions have highlighted the implications for businesses involved in medical manufacturing, contemplating whether the new requirements may deter collaborations or influence the compensation structures for healthcare professionals.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

HI SB61

Relating To Associate Physicians.

HI SB61

Relating To Associate Physicians.

UT HB0400

Associate Physician License Amendments

TN SB0937

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to graduate physicians.

TN HB1311

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to graduate physicians.

TN SB0735

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to graduate physicians.

TN HB2318

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healthcare providers.

TN SB2136

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 55; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healthcare providers.