Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00446

Introduced
1/22/15  
Introduced
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
3/9/15  
Refer
3/9/15  
Report Pass
3/12/15  
Report Pass
3/12/15  
Refer
3/20/15  
Refer
3/20/15  
Report Pass
3/26/15  
Report Pass
3/26/15  
Engrossed
5/29/15  
Engrossed
5/29/15  
Report Pass
5/30/15  
Chaptered
6/17/15  
Chaptered
6/17/15  
Enrolled
6/26/15  
Enrolled
6/26/15  
Passed
6/30/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Domestic Service And The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities.

Impact

The bill is likely to have significant implications on existing laws related to the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities. It revises the processes involved in filing and resolving complaints of discrimination, thus aiming to streamline the investigation and resolution mechanisms. One key amendment is the adjustment of timelines within which respondents must file answers and when assignments are made to investigators after mediation has failed. These changes are positioned to enhance the responsiveness of the commission, potentially reducing the backlog of cases and improving the overall handling of discrimination complaints, especially those pertaining to domestic employees.

Summary

Senate Bill 446, titled 'An Act Concerning Domestic Service and the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities', was introduced to amend various procedural aspects of how complaints related to discrimination are handled in the context of domestic services. The bill specifically redefines the term 'employee' to exclude individuals working in domestic service for family members, thereby aligning the definitions in state statutes with the unique nature of domestic employment. This legislative change is set to take effect from January 1, 2016, and aims to clarify the legal standing of those engaged in domestic work in relation to the broader context of employment discrimination laws.

Sentiment

Throughout discussions surrounding SB 446, the sentiment appears to be cautiously supportive among advocates for fair labor laws, although concerns were raised regarding the exclusion of domestic workers from protections typically afforded to other employees. Proponents argue that the changes are necessary to properly address the complexities of domestic work, which can differ significantly from traditional employment. Conversely, there are apprehensions that the bill might leave certain categories of domestic workers vulnerable, thereby igniting a debate on the balance between necessary legal adjustments and the preservation of worker rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential discrimination against domestic workers due to the classification changes, which some fear could lead to diminished rights and protections for this workforce. The bill's sponsors assert that it will foster a more manageable and effective process for resolving complaints; however, opponents worry that this could compromise the quality of legal protections and the enforcement of rights for those engaged in domestic work. As the bill continues through legislative processes, these concerns will likely remain central to discussions on its final form.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06595

An Act Concerning The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities.

CT HB07303

An Act Concerning The Administration Of The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities And The Resolution Of Complaints Filed With Said Commission.

CT SB00468

An Act Concerning The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities.

CT SB01111

An Act Concerning The Duties Of The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities And The Removal Of The Terms "crippled" And "defective Eyesight" From The General Statutes.

CT SB01192

An Act Concerning The Processing Of Complaints Filed With The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities.

IL SB2487

HUMAN RIGHTS-IDHR CONFERENCE

CT SB00385

An Act Concerning Revisions To Statutes Concerning Human Rights And Opportunities.

IL SB3310

HUMAN RIGHTS-REMEDIES