Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00812

Introduced
1/28/15  
Refer
1/28/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Refer
3/27/15  
Report Pass
3/30/15  
Report Pass
3/30/15  
Refer
4/10/15  
Refer
4/10/15  
Report Pass
4/16/15  
Report Pass
4/16/15  
Refer
4/22/15  
Report Pass
4/27/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Refer
5/5/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Electronic Health Records And Health Information Exchange.

Impact

The bill mandates the creation of a State-wide Health Information Exchange (HIE) that will enhance the sharing of health data across different healthcare providers. This exchange is intended to support better healthcare delivery by facilitating real-time access to patients' health information, thereby reducing unnecessary duplication of services and promoting safer, more efficient care. The legislation requires participation from all healthcare providers with certified electronic health record systems, effectively centralizing and streamlining health data accessibility throughout the state.

Summary

SB00812, titled 'An Act Concerning Electronic Health Records and Health Information Exchange', aims to empower patients by establishing clear ownership rights over their health records. The bill stipulates that all patient health records, including electronic formats, must be readily accessible to patients and their authorized representatives. This initiative is part of a broader effort to enhance patient-centered care and promote better healthcare decision-making by ensuring that patients can access their information regardless of the provider's location or affiliation.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB00812 is predominantly positive. Supporters view the bill as a significant step toward improving patient autonomy and enhancing the quality of healthcare delivery. However, potential challenges regarding privacy and data security have been raised, indicating that while the intentions are commendable, the implementation will require careful attention to safeguard sensitive health information.

Contention

Notably, some concerns stem from how the bill's provisions, particularly regarding data sharing and interoperability requirements, might impose additional burdens on smaller healthcare providers. Critics argue that while increasing access is essential, it must not compromise patient privacy or overwhelm providers with compliance requirements. There's a fundamental tension between facilitating broader access to health information and maintaining robust privacy protections for patients, which will need to be addressed as the bill moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3309

Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an electronic notary public; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.

TX HB1217

Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an online notary public and online acknowledgment and proof of written instruments; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.

NC S552

Modifications to Notary Public Act

CA AB1667

Electronic wills.

CA AB2961

Civil procedure: electronic filing and service.

LA HB572

Provides for electronic notaries public and electronic notarial acts

CA AB2283

Civil actions: electronic service.

CA SB666

Service of papers: electronic service by court.