Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00898

Introduced
2/11/15  
Refer
2/11/15  
Refer
2/11/15  
Report Pass
3/24/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Report Pass
4/8/15  
Report Pass
4/8/15  
Engrossed
5/7/15  
Engrossed
5/7/15  
Report Pass
5/8/15  
Chaptered
5/27/15  
Chaptered
5/27/15  
Enrolled
6/1/15  
Enrolled
6/1/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Professional Doctoral Degree Programs.

Impact

The bill will significantly impact the governance of public higher education in Connecticut by restructuring the responsibilities of various boards concerning degree programs. It stipulates that when approving new professional doctoral degree programs, the Board of Trustees must consider factors such as fiscal implications for the institution, existing expertise, and accreditation standards. This approach not only mitigates financial risks to the state but also ensures that programs are established based on professional relevance and educational needs. Consequently, this could lead to more relevant programs that meet the labor market's demands for skilled professionals.

Summary

Senate Bill 00898, titled 'An Act Concerning Professional Doctoral Degree Programs', aims to clarify and reorganize the authority responsible for overseeing professional doctoral degree programs offered by state institutions of higher education in Connecticut. The bill specifies that the Board of Trustees for the Connecticut State University System will have special responsibility for certain degree programs while delineating the oversight roles of other educational governing bodies regarding different degrees. This reorganization seeks to streamline the process and enhance the management of these critical educational programs, aligning them with state goals in higher education.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 00898 appears to be generally supportive among stakeholders involved in higher education, as the restructuring of responsibilities is seen as a proactive measure to ensure that institutions maintain high standards and fiscal responsibility. Proponents argue that this will enhance the quality and relevance of professional degrees in the state, while critics, if any, may still need to address concerns about bureaucracy and the adequacy of support for emerging programs. Overall, the dialogue seems to reflect a commitment to improving higher education without compromising on governance and accountability.

Contention

Although the bill contains elements that could lead to improvement in higher education, there may be notable contention surrounding the adequacy of resources and support for the universities to implement new programs effectively. Concerns also exist regarding whether certain programs, especially in niche areas, will receive appropriate attention and funding under the new regulatory framework. There may be debates on how well the various boards can work together and share resources efficiently to foster innovative and effective education solutions in Connecticut.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.