Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05150

Introduced
2/10/16  
Refer
2/10/16  
Refer
2/10/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Refer
3/28/16  
Report Pass
4/4/16  
Refer
4/12/16  
Report Pass
4/19/16  
Report Pass
4/19/16  
Refer
4/19/16  
Refer
4/19/16  
Engrossed
4/28/16  
Engrossed
4/28/16  
Report Pass
4/29/16  
Chaptered
5/13/16  
Chaptered
5/13/16  
Enrolled
5/18/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Tree Wardens' Notices On Trees And Shrubs Prior To Removal And Tree Removal And Clean-up By Public Utility Corporations.

Impact

The implementation of HB 05150 represents a significant shift in how public utility corporations handle vegetation management within utility protection zones. By requiring utilities to develop and disclose annual plans for vegetation management, including timelines and locations for proposed work, the bill aims to foster greater transparency. Additionally, this ensures that local communities are informed about potential tree removals or prunings, allowing them the opportunity to voice objections and participate in the dialogue through public hearings.

Summary

House Bill 05150, titled 'An Act Concerning Tree Wardens' Notices On Trees And Shrubs Prior To Removal And Tree Removal And Clean-up By Public Utility Corporations', seeks to establish clearer protocols and responsibilities related to tree management overseen by tree wardens. The bill specifies that tree wardens are responsible for the care and control of trees and shrubs within public roads and grounds in their jurisdictions, except for state-controlled areas. It also details the procedures for tree removal, including notice periods and appeals processes for affected parties, aiming to enhance public safety while ensuring public participation in the decision-making process.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 05150 appears to be cautiously supportive among stakeholders concerned with public safety and environmental management. Supporters argue that the bill strikes a balance between necessary tree management for public safety and maintaining community involvement in the process. However, there are concerns about potential conflicts between utility needs and local preferences, especially regarding the extent of tree removals and the adequacy of notice provided to residents.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves the balance between utility operations and the preservation of community aesthetics and ecology. Critics of the bill fear that while the provisions promote safety, they could also enable excessive tree removal under the guise of maintenance. There are worries that the bill might complicate the relationship between utility companies and local residents, particularly if residents feel that their input is not adequately considered in the decision-making process. Overall, the bill raises important discussions regarding the management of public resources and the role of local governments in overseeing such processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.