Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05540

Introduced
3/2/16  
Refer
3/2/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Refer
3/28/16  
Report Pass
4/4/16  
Report Pass
4/4/16  
Engrossed
4/27/16  
Engrossed
4/27/16  
Report Pass
4/28/16  
Report Pass
4/28/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  
Enrolled
5/25/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning The State Water Plan.

Impact

The bill is set to amend existing statutes regarding the management of water resources, effectively ensuring that future decisions around water are data-driven and take into account climate change's impact. Importantly, the legislation stipulates that the state water plan should include measures for improving the resilience of water infrastructure to extreme weather events, which is a crucial adaptation strategy in light of climate unpredictability. Additionally, it requires public input and transparency throughout the planning process, giving citizens a role in how their water resources are managed.

Summary

House Bill 5540, also known as the Act Concerning The State Water Plan, establishes a comprehensive framework for the management of the state’s water resources. It tasks the Water Planning Council with preparing a state water plan by 2017, which will include an evaluation of water availability for public supply, environmental benefits, and economic growth. The bill emphasizes the importance of balancing water usage among various sectors, including public health and ecological health, aiming to foster a sustainable approach to water management in Connecticut.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB 5540 appears to be broadly positive, with support stemming from various stakeholders who recognize the urgent need for a structured approach to water management. The comprehensive nature of the bill is seen as a proactive step towards ensuring the state's water resources are managed efficiently and equitably. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the adequacy of public participation in the planning process, with calls for ensuring that the voices of local communities are adequately heard.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the potential for the bill to prioritize economic development over other critical water uses, including environmental conservation and recreational needs. Critics have expressed concern that while economic considerations are important, they should not eclipse the necessity for protecting ecosystems that depend on stable water supplies. The debate highlights the ongoing challenge of finding a balance between economic growth and environmental stewardship in water resource management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2314

Native American Voting Accessibility Advisory Committee.

CA AB852

Pupil instruction: academic content standards: update of adopted standards.

CA AB1225

State parks: Accessibility Advisory Committee.

CA ACA23

Legislative committees: prohibition on holding bills in committee.

LA HB500

Provides for legislative development of budget (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

CA SB1350

Occupational safety and health: definitions.

CA AB652

Department of Pesticide Regulation Environmental Justice Advisory Committee.

SC S0253

Audit Support