Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05546

Introduced
3/2/16  
Refer
3/2/16  
Report Pass
3/15/16  
Report Pass
3/15/16  
Refer
3/21/16  
Refer
3/21/16  
Report Pass
3/29/16  
Report Pass
3/29/16  
Refer
4/5/16  
Refer
4/5/16  
Report Pass
4/12/16  
Report Pass
4/12/16  
Engrossed
4/19/16  
Engrossed
4/19/16  
Report Pass
4/21/16  
Report Pass
4/21/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  
Enrolled
5/25/16  
Passed
6/6/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Charitable Games.

Impact

By implementing these changes, the bill is expected to strengthen consumer protection by allowing for better monitoring and enforcement of compliance among organizations that host charitable events. The commissioner will have the ability to refer any identified violations to the appropriate state's attorney based on the location of the sponsoring organization or the charity event. This adjustment could lead to more rigorous enforcement of regulations, potentially deterring misconduct in the operation of charitable games.

Summary

House Bill 5546 aims to enhance regulatory oversight of charitable games, specifically addressing the administration and compliance aspects of conducting such games, which include lotteries and raffles. The bill proposes to amend Section 7-183 of the general statutes to grant the Commissioner of Consumer Protection the authority to examine reports from charitable organizations conducting games. This measure is intended to improve transparency and ensure that organizations adhere to the rules governing charitable fundraisers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5546 appears to be primarily supportive, especially among consumer advocacy groups and legislators who prioritize accountability in charitable fundraising. There is a recognition of the importance of ensuring that funds raised through these games are properly managed and used for their intended charitable purposes. Supporters argue that the proposed changes will enhance trust in charitable organizations, which is vital for public support and participation.

Contention

While the overall sentiment is positive, there may be concerns regarding the additional regulatory burden on charitable organizations, particularly smaller nonprofits that may find compliance challenging. Critics of increased regulation often highlight the need for a balance between oversight and the ability of charities to raise funds effectively. The discussion may focus on whether the bill could inadvertently hinder charitable activities, a point that organizations may raise during future legislative sessions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.