Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05554

Introduced
3/2/16  
Refer
3/2/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Refer
3/24/16  
Refer
3/24/16  
Report Pass
3/31/16  
Report Pass
3/31/16  
Refer
4/5/16  
Refer
4/5/16  
Report Pass
4/11/16  
Report Pass
4/11/16  
Engrossed
4/20/16  
Engrossed
4/20/16  
Report Pass
4/22/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Regional Education.

Impact

The legislation introduces amendments to several sections of the general statutes that relate to the funding and administration of educational projects. Notably, it makes provisions for regional educational service centers to offer administrative services and share resources among local boards of education. This approach is expected to streamline operations and optimize resources across districts, particularly in managing pupil personnel and compliance with state education laws. Additionally, it formalizes the grant application process, establishing a framework that aligns with educational needs determined by the state.

Summary

House Bill 05554, titled 'An Act Concerning Regional Education,' primarily focuses on enhancing the management and cooperation among educational boards in Connecticut. The bill aims to establish a more structured grant application system for school building projects, enabling towns and regional school districts to apply for and accept funding more effectively. It dictates that each board of education must report expenditures related to cooperative arrangements, thereby ensuring greater transparency and accountability concerning public funds allocated for educational purposes.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 05554 appears to be supportive among legislators who see it as a necessary step toward improved educational infrastructure and collaboration. The propensity for shared services among districts is viewed as a method to combat resource scarcity and enhance educational outcomes. However, there are concerns about the implications for local autonomy and whether these cooperative agreements might inadvertently limit individual boards' decision-making capacities regarding educational policies.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves the execution of cooperative agreements, which allow multiple boards of education to collaborate on various educational services. Critics argue that while such arrangements can lead to increased efficiency, they might also dilute local control over educational matters and lead to a one-size-fits-all approach to issues that require local specificity. Additionally, the mandated financial reports for cooperative arrangements may pose administrative burdens on smaller districts that lack the resources to comply with the new requirements efficiently.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05551

An Act Concerning The Commissioner's Network Of Schools.

RI S0861

Allows when authorized by the board of regents, the commissioner to designate a receiver for the district with all the powers of the superintendent and school committee.

CT HB07251

An Act Concerning Reform District Turnaround Plans.

NJ A4194

Prohibits cooperative from receiving public works contract when cooperative-approved vendor fails to pay prevailing wage; concerns cooperative purchasing agreements with other states; and permits contracting units to award certain indefinite contracts.

CA AB3260

Department of Food and Agriculture: administrative civil penalties: notice.

CA SB930

Financial institutions: cannabis.

CA SB51

California Competes tax credit: refunds.

MN HF2904

Public employees insurance program regulated, participation by certain school employers required, and money appropriated.