Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00121

Introduced
2/17/16  
Refer
2/17/16  
Refer
2/17/16  
Report Pass
3/15/16  
Report Pass
3/15/16  
Refer
3/22/16  
Refer
3/22/16  
Report Pass
3/30/16  
Report Pass
3/30/16  
Engrossed
4/13/16  
Engrossed
4/13/16  
Report Pass
4/14/16  
Report Pass
4/14/16  
Chaptered
4/25/16  
Chaptered
4/25/16  
Enrolled
4/27/16  

Caption

An Act Repealing Certain Statutes Related To Moving Pictures.

Impact

The repeal of these statutes is expected to have a substantial impact on how moving pictures are regulated in the state. Supporters believe that this change will eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic obstacles that can hinder the production process. By aligning state regulations with modern standards, filmmakers may find it easier to operate, thereby fostering local economic growth and enhancing the state's attractiveness as a location for film production.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 121 aims to repeal several provisions related to the regulation of moving pictures within the state statutes. This act seeks to modernize and streamline the legal framework governing the film industry, which advocates argue has evolved significantly since these older laws were enacted. By removing outdated statutory regulations, the bill intends to facilitate a more business-friendly environment for filmmakers and producers in the state, while also aiming to reflect current industry practices.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB00121 appears to be largely positive, with many stakeholders in the entertainment and media sectors expressing support for the bill. Advocates highlight the need for updated regulations that better align with contemporary practices in the film industry. However, there is recognition of the potential for pushback from those who may have concerns about the thoroughness of oversight following the repeal of existing statutes.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about whether repealing these laws will truly result in better outcomes for regulatory oversight. Critics argue that the removal of certain statutes could lead to gaps in regulation that might impact consumer protection and industry standards. This concern underscores the ongoing debate about the balance between fostering economic development and ensuring adequate regulatory measures are in place.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB516

Sex offenses: disabled victims.

CA AB2123

District-based elections.

CA AB453

District-based elections.

MI HB4122

Health occupations: health professionals; permanent revocation of license or registration if convicted of sexual conduct under pretext of medical treatment; provide for. Amends sec. 16226 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16226). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4121'23

CA AB3171

Controlled substances: fentanyl.

CA AB892

Sex offenders: registration: solicitation of a minor.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.