Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00143

Introduced
2/18/16  
Introduced
2/18/16  
Refer
2/18/16  
Refer
2/18/16  
Report Pass
3/28/16  
Report Pass
3/28/16  
Refer
4/5/16  
Refer
4/5/16  
Report Pass
4/12/16  
Report Pass
4/12/16  
Engrossed
4/26/16  
Engrossed
4/26/16  
Report Pass
4/28/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning State Agency Compliance With Probate Court Orders.

Impact

The enactment of SB00143 would have a considerable impact on state laws regarding agency operations and judicial compliance. By explicitly stating that state agencies must adhere to Probate Court orders, the bill reinforces the authority of the probate judicial system in administrative matters and could potentially reduce disputes over compliance. Furthermore, the bill outlines the appeals process for agencies aggrieved by such orders, thereby providing a structured avenue for legal redress while ensuring that the implementation of orders is not halted pending appeal.

Summary

SB00143 aims to establish clearer procedures regarding how state agencies interact with orders issued by Probate Courts. By mandating that all state agencies recognize, apply, and enforce orders from Probate Courts in contested cases, the bill seeks to streamline the compliance process and reduce instances of conflict between state agencies and judicial mandates. This represents a significant shift in the procedural landscape for agencies, as they will now have an enhanced responsibility to act in accordance with Probate Court decisions.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB00143 appears to be supportive, particularly from judicial advocates who emphasize the importance of reinforcing the judicial system's rulings. Proponents view the bill as a necessary measure to enhance accountability and consistency in legal proceedings that involve state agencies. Nevertheless, some concerns were raised regarding the implications for agency autonomy and the potential for increased litigation as agencies navigate the expanded duties to comply with court orders.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance of power between state agencies and the judicial system. Critics express apprehension that increased mandates for compliance could lead to bureaucratic challenges, especially in cases where legal interpretations may vary. Additionally, the appeal process outlined in the bill raises questions about timing and efficiency, as the enforcement of orders remains ongoing during appeals, potentially complicating the legal landscape and straining resources of both probate courts and state agencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00324

An Act Concerning Probate Court Operations And Administration.

CT SB00426

An Act Concerning Court Operations And Administrative Proceedings.

CT HB05506

An Act Concerning Families With Service Needs.

CT HB05236

An Act Concerning Recommendations By The Department Of Consumer Protection.

CT SB00381

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Mandated Reporter Requirements.

CT HB05420

An Act Concerning The Provision Of Child Support To Children Under The Age Of Twenty-one.

CT SB00212

An Act Concerning The Revisor's Technical Corrections To The General Statutes.

CT SB00445

An Act Concerning A Jobs Program For Youth Impacted By The Juvenile Justice System, Review Of Probation Violations And State-wide Expansion Of Truancy Clinics.

CT HB05310

An Act Concerning Presidential Electors And The Certification Or Declaration Of Election Results.

CT SB00251

An Act Concerning The Legislative Commissioners' Recommendations For Technical And Other Revisions To The Tax And Related Statutes.

Similar Bills

CA AB1576

Superior court: lactation rooms.

IN HB1144

Courts.

CA AB253

Remote court reporting.

CA AB1363

Protective orders: Wyland’s Law.

CA AB972

Local Assistance and Grant Program Streamlining Workgroup.

CA AB881

Juror fees: pilot program.

DC B25-0485

Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act of 2023

CA AB3013

Courts: remote court reporting.