Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00373

Introduced
3/2/16  
Introduced
3/2/16  
Refer
3/2/16  
Refer
3/2/16  
Report Pass
3/17/16  
Report Pass
3/17/16  
Refer
3/28/16  
Refer
3/28/16  
Report Pass
4/4/16  
Report Pass
4/4/16  
Refer
4/19/16  

Caption

An Act Limiting Changes To Health Insurers' Prescription Drug Formularies.

Impact

If enacted, SB00373 will amend state laws regarding health insurance policies by providing more robust protections for consumers against abrupt changes in drug coverage. It seeks to ensure continuity of care for individuals dependent on specific medications, aiming to mitigate unexpected financial burdens due to increased costs associated with necessary prescriptions. This could lead to a more stable insurance landscape for patients who require ongoing treatment for chronic conditions.

Summary

SB00373 aims to limit changes that health insurers can make to their prescription drug formularies, specifically prohibiting the removal of covered drugs or their reclassification to a higher cost-sharing tier during a policy term. The bill stipulates that such changes can only occur if a drug is deemed unsafe or ineffective by the FDA or through authoritative medical literature. This legislative effort is designed to protect consumers, particularly those with chronic illnesses who depend on consistent access to their medications.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB00373 appears generally supportive among healthcare advocates and patient groups who view it as a necessary safeguard for consumers. However, insurance companies and some industry stakeholders may express concerns about the implications this bill has on their operational flexibility and cost management in response to changing medication landscapes. Overall, the discourse reflects a tension between consumer protection and the interests of the insurers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for increased insurance premiums or other cost-shifting measures that insurers might implement in response to the constraints imposed by the bill. Additionally, there may be debates surrounding the definition of 'safe and effective' in the context of drug reclassification and how this intersects with clinical judgment. Stakeholders on both sides are likely to engage in discussions regarding the balance of regulatory oversight and the autonomy of health insurers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2789

Health care practitioners: prescriptions: electronic data transmission.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.

CA AB149

Controlled substances: prescriptions.

TX SB594

Relating to the regulation of prescriptions for controlled substances, including certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2246

Relating to certain procedures applicable to electronic prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.

TX HB2766

Relating to electronic and other controlled substance prescriptions under the Texas Controlled Substances Act; authorizing a fee.