Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05135

Introduced
1/4/17  
Introduced
1/4/17  
Refer
1/4/17  
Refer
1/4/17  
Refer
3/1/17  
Refer
3/1/17  
Report Pass
3/7/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Engrossed
6/5/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Electronic Proof Of Automobile Insurance Identification Cards.

Impact

If enacted, HB 05135 would significantly impact existing laws related to motor vehicle registration and insurance verification. It authorizes the commissioner of motor vehicles to accept electronic displays of insurance cards, which would enhance convenience for vehicle owners. The amendment to Section 14-12b of the general statutes would also help align Connecticut's regulations with the technological advancements seen in other states, promoting efficiency in law enforcement verification methods. Additionally, the bill specifies that the law enforcement officials are restricted from viewing other content on a device unless explicitly consented by the individual showing the card.

Summary

House Bill 05135 aims to modernize the way automobile insurance identification cards are presented, allowing individuals to use electronic means, such as a mobile phone, to display proof of insurance. This legislative change seeks to streamline the registration process for motor vehicles in Connecticut by permitting the use of an electronic image of the insurance card instead of a physical card. The bill reflects a growing trend towards digitalization in various aspects of government and consumer interaction.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 05135 appears to be positive. Legislators who support the bill argue that it addresses the needs of modern consumers who frequently rely on digital formats for documentation. Supporters praise it as a necessary update to facilitate smoother interactions between drivers and law enforcement, while also encouraging the adoption of technology in public service. However, there could be concerns from skeptics regarding the reliability of electronic proof and potential issues such as access inequality to technology among users.

Contention

Although the bill is largely viewed as a progressive step, some points of contention persist. Critics may argue that allowing only electronic proof could disadvantage individuals without access to smartphones or those who prefer traditional methods of documentation. Furthermore, discussions may delve into privacy concerns about the security of digital information during roadside checks. This reflects a broader debate on balancing modern conveniences against potential risks associated with digital systems, particularly in the realm of personal security and data privacy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SJ00007

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CT HJ00041

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims.

CT HJ00023

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner Extensions Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00038

Resolution Concerning The Disposition Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CA AB2009

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB1920

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB2323

Insurance: covered communications.

CA AB736

California Travel and Tourism Commission: meetings: records and minutes.