Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06715

Introduced
1/24/17  
Refer
1/24/17  
Refer
1/24/17  
Refer
2/1/17  

Caption

An Act Increasing The Penalties For The Intentional Injury Or Killing Of Police Animals Or Dogs In Volunteer Canine Search And Rescue Teams.

Impact

If enacted, HB06715 will significantly increase the legal ramifications for individuals who harm police animals or trained search and rescue dogs. This amendment to section 53-247 of the general statutes signifies a prohibition against intentional acts that would bring harm to these animals while they are performing their duties. By imposing stricter penalties, lawmakers argue that the bill equips law enforcement with better tools to protect their essential partners and enhances the support for those involved in volunteer rescue efforts.

Summary

House Bill 06715 aims to enhance the legal protections afforded to police animals and dogs partaking in volunteer canine search and rescue teams. The bill proposes to reclassify the criminal penalties associated with the intentional injury or killing of these animals, changing such offenses from a Class D felony to a Class C felony for injuries, and from a fine and possible imprisonment to a Class B felony for killings. These changes are intended to serve as a strong deterrent against the harming of animals that assist law enforcement officials and volunteer organizations in their duties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears positive, with strong support expressed among legislators and public safety advocates. Proponents emphasize the value of police animals in aiding law enforcement and community safety efforts, arguing that heightened penalties reflect societal acknowledgment of their important role and sacrifice. Opponents, however, have raised concerns about the adequacy of existing penalties and whether the new classifications would effectively address behaviors that endanger these animals.

Contention

Notable contention arises regarding the potential effectiveness of increased penalties as a deterrent. Critics of the bill question whether harsher punishments will truly prevent malicious actions against police animals, suggesting of the need for broader education about the role of these animals and improving community awareness about animal rights in general. Additionally, discussions about the appropriateness of classifying such offenses as felonies have prompted debate on aligning penalties with societal values while ensuring that punishment is fair and just.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.