Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07044

Introduced
2/9/17  
Introduced
2/9/17  
Refer
2/9/17  
Refer
2/9/17  
Report Pass
4/4/17  
Refer
4/17/17  
Refer
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/24/17  
Report Pass
4/24/17  
Engrossed
6/3/17  
Engrossed
6/3/17  
Report Pass
6/4/17  
Report Pass
6/4/17  
Chaptered
6/19/17  
Chaptered
6/19/17  
Enrolled
6/20/17  
Passed
6/27/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Pretrial Justice Reform.

Impact

The bill seeks to alleviate the burden on the judicial system and address concerns of equity in pretrial detention. By removing financial barriers for minor offenses, it aims to reduce the jail population and allows individuals to maintain their jobs and families while awaiting trial. This aligns with broader movements nationwide advocating for criminal justice reform, particularly concerning the disproportionate impacts of cash bail on low-income individuals and communities of color.

Summary

House Bill 07044, titled 'An Act Concerning Pretrial Justice Reform,' aims to reform the bail system in Connecticut. The bill establishes that individuals charged with misdemeanors should generally not be subjected to financial conditions for release. Instead, the court must find specific risks that warrant such conditions. The proposed changes are intended to prevent unnecessary detainment of individuals who have not yet been convicted, particularly impacting vulnerable populations who may struggle to meet bail requirements.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 07044 is largely positive among advocates of criminal justice reform, who see it as a necessary step towards a fairer system. However, there is significant contention from some law enforcement and public safety advocates who express concerns that loosening bail conditions could lead to an increase in court nonappearances or even re-offending. The sentiments reflect a broader debate on balancing public safety with the rights of the accused.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the definitions of risk that would justify imposing financial bail conditions, particularly regarding family violence crimes. Critics argue that the bill may inadequately address situations where there's a significant risk to potential victims. Additionally, there's discussion around the feasibility of adequately supporting the system's requirements for monitoring compliance with the new conditions without additional funding or resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.