An Act Concerning The Claim Against The State Of Millicent Corbett.
Impact
The enactment of HB 7081 will allow Millicent Corbett's claim, which dates back to an alleged property damage incident in 2009, to be heard despite procedural shortcomings. This bill underscores the legislative intent to provide compassion and flexibility within the claims process, particularly when circumstances may warrant special consideration. It effectively tolls the statutory deadlines as established in the state’s legislation, thereby enabling claims to be presented more equitably.
Summary
House Bill 7081 pertains to a specific claim against the state of Connecticut brought forth by Millicent Corbett. The bill allows Corbett to present her claim to the Claims Commissioner despite not having filed a proper notice within the customary time limits. This provision serves to recognize the public purpose of ensuring that individuals who claim injury due to state actions can fully adjudicate their cases. The bill highlights the General Assembly's intent to support accountability within state government while ensuring that individuals are not unduly barred from seeking justice based on procedural technicalities.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 7081 appears largely favorable among legislators, who recognized the need for fairness in dealing with claims against the state. The positive outlook reflects an understanding that strict adherence to procedural rules should not preclude individuals from receiving justice, particularly when compelling circumstances are present. However, there may be concerns about the implications of such exceptions on the broader legal framework governing state claims.
Contention
Some points of contention may arise regarding the impact this bill could have on similar future cases, as precedence could be interpreted by other claimants or the courts. While the bill directly pertains to Millicent Corbett, it raises broader questions about how the state addresses the claim process and exemptions, particularly when statutes are designed to protect the state from limitless liability due to delays in claims notice. These considerations may lead to debates over legal interpretations and potential adjustments to claims legislation in future sessions.
Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Mark Stuart And Remanding The Matter To The Claims Commissioner For Further Proceedings.
Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.