Connecticut House Bill HB07220

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/17
• Refer: 3/1/17
• Report Pass: 3/27/17
• Refer: 4/7/17
• Report Pass: 4/13/17
• Engrossed: 6/3/17
• Report Pass: 6/4/17

Caption

An Act Concerning The Department Of Public Health's Recommendations Regarding Safe Drinking Water.

Impact

The bill would significantly impact state laws regarding the oversight and management of small water companies. It establishes a clear requirement for water companies to develop sound management strategies and to report their findings and plans to the Department of Public Health. The legislation could lead to stricter enforcement of health and safety standards, potentially resulting in penalties for companies that fail to comply. Furthermore, the bill provides the Commissioner of Public Health with powers to inspect and take action against non-compliant companies, aimed at safeguarding drinking water supplies and enhancing the overall public health safety infrastructure.

Summary

House Bill 07220 aims to enhance the framework governing small community water systems by requiring them to create comprehensive fiscal and asset management plans. This new legislation emphasizes the importance of maintaining water quality and ensures that small water companies adhere to safety and operational standards. By mandating water companies to assess their capital assets, maintain records, and update their management plans annually, the bill seeks to ensure that these providers can deliver reliable and potable water to consumers, thereby addressing public health concerns related to water safety.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding HB07220 appears largely positive, as it responds to the need for improved oversight of water quality in small community water systems. Supporters, including public health advocates, see the bill as a proactive measure to ensure safe drinking water and to enhance the public health response framework. However, some may express concerns regarding the financial impact on smaller water companies required to fulfill these new mandates, questioning whether they have the resources to develop and maintain the required management plans.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves the potential financial burden on small water companies, which may lack the sufficient capital to develop and maintain extensive management plans. Critics may argue that the requirements could disproportionately affect smaller operators, leading to increased costs that could be passed on to consumers through higher water rates. Additionally, while the bill aims to establish accountability and transparency in water management, there is some concern regarding the appropriate balance between regulatory oversight and the operational capabilities of smaller water service providers.