Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07276

Introduced
3/14/17  
Refer
3/14/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/11/17  
Report Pass
4/11/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Report Pass
5/31/17  
Report Pass
5/31/17  
Chaptered
6/23/17  
Chaptered
6/23/17  
Enrolled
6/29/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Education Mandate Relief.

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws primarily revolves around adjusting existing laws concerning the requirements for educational boards to provide alternative education. By allowing educational boards to potentially limit the obligation to offer such programs, it seeks to streamline the requirements placed on these boards while focusing on compliance with state standards. Additionally, HB 07276 mandates the creation of a uniform regional school calendar, which could help in synchronizing academic schedules across districts, thereby relieving some administrative burdens.

Summary

House Bill 07276, titled 'An Act Concerning Education Mandate Relief,' is designed to provide flexibility and relief from certain educational mandates imposed on local and regional boards of education in Connecticut. The bill includes provisions for offering alternative educational opportunities for students who have been expelled, particularly focusing on those under the age of sixteen and providing options for those aged sixteen to eighteen to continue their education. This is aimed at ensuring that these students do not fall behind despite disruptions in their schooling due to expulsion.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 07276 reflects a mix of support and concern. Supporters argue it will foster a more adaptable educational environment that better meets the needs of students who face expulsion. They believe that the changes will enhance the opportunities for these students to succeed and stay engaged with their education. Conversely, there are concerns regarding the adequacy of the alternative educational opportunities that may be provided and whether such a bill might lead to reduced educational quality or access for vulnerable student populations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include potential disagreements over the sufficiency of alternative educational settings and the extent to which local boards might feel pressured to reduce offerings due to the new flexibility provided. Some legislators voiced worries that without strict guidelines, boards could under-serve expelled students, exacerbating educational inequalities. Furthermore, there is a debate about the continued relevance and necessity of training for staff on physical restraint and seclusion in schools, particularly how this correlates with the mental health of students facing disciplinary actions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CO HB1013

Use Of Restrictive Practices In Prisons

CO HB1376

Supportive Learning Environments For K-12 Students

CT SB00459

An Act Concerning The Correction Advisory Committee, The Use Of Isolated Confinement And Transparency For Conditions Of Incarceration.

CO HB1178

Ban Student Seclusion

CT SB01059

An Act Concerning The Office Of The Correction Ombuds, The Use Of Isolated Confinement, Seclusion And Restraints, Social Contacts For Incarcerated Persons And Training And Workers' Compensation Benefits For Correction.

CO HB1167

Prohibit Student Seclusion

CA AB107

Developmental services.

CA SB91

Developmental services.